Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Middle East    Osama Bin Laden: Palestinian cause fuels war
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
CAIRO, Egypt—Osama bin Laden said in a new audio recording released Friday that al-Qaida will continue its holy war against Israel and its allies until it liberates Palestine.

The terrorist leader's third statement this year came as President Bush was wrapping up his visit to Israel to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the Jewish state.

Bin Laden said the fight for the Palestinian cause was the most important factor driving al-Qaida's war with the West and fueled 19 Muslims to carry out the suicide attacks against the U.S. on September 11.

"To Western nations ... this speech is to understand the core reason of the war between our civilization and your civilizations. I mean the Palestinian cause," said bin Laden in the close to 10 minute audiotape.

"The Palestinian cause is the major issue for my (Islamic) nation. It was an important element in fueling me from the beginning and the 19 others with a great motive to fight for those subjected to injustice and the oppressed," added bin Laden.

Al-Qaida has been stepping up its attempts to use the Israeli-Arab conflict to rally supporters. Israel has warned of growing al-Qaida activity in Palestinian territory, though the terror network is not believed to have taken a strong role there so far.

The al-Qaida leader said the Western media managed to brainwash people over the past 60 years by "portraying the Jewish invaders, the occupiers of our land, as the victims while it portrayed us as the terrorists."

"Sixty years ago, the Israeli state didn't exist. Instead, it was established on the land of Palestine raped by force," said bin Laden. "Israelis are occupying invaders whom we should fight."

Bin Laden said Western leaders were insincere in their expressed desire for Israeli-Palestinian peace and failed to criticize Israel.

"Peace talks that started 60 years ago are just meant to deceive the idiots," said bin Laden. "After all the destruction and the killings ... your leaders talk about principles. This is unbearable."

The terrorist leader mentioned former Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, who he said ordered a Jewish militia to attack the Arab village of Deir Yassin in 1948. The attack during Israel's push for statehood killed more than 100 Arabs and forced the rest of the village to flee.

"Instead of punishing him (Begin) over his crimes ... he was awarded a Nobel prize," said bin Laden.

Begin won the Nobel peace prize for negotiating a peace treaty with Egypt in 1979, Israel's first with an Arab nation. The Israeli leader shared the prize with former Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, who was Begin's negotiating partner. Israel has only signed one other peace treaty with an Arab nation, Jordan.

"We will continue our struggle against the Israelis and their allies," said bin Laden. "We are not going to give up an inch of the land of Palestine."

Bin Laden's message Friday followed an audiotape released in March in which he lashed out at Palestinian peace negotiations with Israel.

So, my fellow Americans, as this statement identifies, the "War on Terrorism" is basically a war between Israel and their supporters of their violent theft of lands VS. those parties, (from Al Qaida to Hamas), who are retaliating for this unjust act, and the associated oppression of the victims, i.e. the Palestinians.

How can America be supporting the obvious thieves, the group who started this mess, with our brave soldiers / marines lives??? Why should we be dying to support a Jewish State which was created by the destruction and eviction of millions of innocent civilians?

Especially considering our American policies of supporting and representing Liberty and justice for ALL, we should not be supporting repression and oppression of civilians by a particular religious group, even if it is a Jewish group VS. a moslem one.

If we stopped supporting the Israeli occupation, and supported a just resolution of the injustices of the last 60 years, perhaps the War on Terrorism would no longer have any foundation or purpose.

Wouldn't that be a smart thing to do, considering the fact that our Middle Eastern policies of the last 60 years have only perpetuated and even expanded the conflict in the Middle East; and even brought this injustice to OUR shores.

As an American, I want my country to do the right thing, and no longer support the Israeli occupation with the resultant refugees and other civilian victims of this support.
We are supposed to be better than this. And our soldiers / marines should not be dying to support the wrong causes.

 
Posts: 1539 | Registered: Tue 09 October 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Super Member
Picture of Sgt_Schlappy
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Osama bin Laden said in a new audio recording released Friday that al-Qaida will continue its holy war against Israel and its allies until it liberates Palestine.

Their definition of "liberation" is the problem.

OBL and his supporters define it as Israel's destruction and a return of the land to the gypsies who previously ruled over it. Not gonna happen.
 
Posts: 21119 | Registered: Mon 22 April 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sgt_Schlappy:
quote:
Osama bin Laden said in a new audio recording released Friday that al-Qaida will continue its holy war against Israel and its allies until it liberates Palestine.

Their definition of "liberation" is the problem.

OBL and his supporters define it as Israel's destruction and a return of the land to the gypsies who previously ruled over it. Not gonna happen.


That's why "negotiations" would take place. And though YOU consider them "gypsies", they lived in homes which require bulldozers to knock them down.
And the "Not gonna happen" concept has already led to SIXTY YEARS of an ongoing conflict, which has increased in scope, not decreased.

Another words, something OTHER than the "not gonna happen" policy has to be applied.
 
Posts: 1539 | Registered: Tue 09 October 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
And what about the concept of AMERICAN soldiers / marines dying to defend the unjust, i.e., JUST PLAIN WRONG ACTS of Israel?
Doesn't that bother you? Shouldn't AMERICANS only defend righteous causes, not thieves?
 
Posts: 1539 | Registered: Tue 09 October 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Super Member
Picture of Sgt_Schlappy
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DougSabbag:
quote:
Originally posted by Sgt_Schlappy:
quote:
Osama bin Laden said in a new audio recording released Friday that al-Qaida will continue its holy war against Israel and its allies until it liberates Palestine.

Their definition of "liberation" is the problem.

OBL and his supporters define it as Israel's destruction and a return of the land to the gypsies who previously ruled over it. Not gonna happen.


That's why "negotiations" would take place. And though YOU consider them "gypsies", they lived in homes which require bulldozers to knock them down.
And the "Not gonna happen" concept has already led to SIXTY YEARS of an ongoing conflict, which has increased in scope, not decreased.

Another words, something OTHER than the "not gonna happen" policy has to be applied.

The gypsies can go back to their homeland of Jordan and Egypt if they don't like the current situation or the options that are presented to them.

They had a chance for a new homeland (a generous offer btw) and they decided that the status quo of violent conflict was preferred. That generous offer is now off the table and they have no one but themselves to blame.

Israel is determined to survived...and bottom line is, with or without our assistance, they will.
 
Posts: 21119 | Registered: Mon 22 April 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sgt_Schlappy:
quote:
Originally posted by DougSabbag:
quote:
Originally posted by Sgt_Schlappy:
quote:
Osama bin Laden said in a new audio recording released Friday that al-Qaida will continue its holy war against Israel and its allies until it liberates Palestine.

Their definition of "liberation" is the problem.

OBL and his supporters define it as Israel's destruction and a return of the land to the gypsies who previously ruled over it. Not gonna happen.


That's why "negotiations" would take place. And though YOU consider them "gypsies", they lived in homes which require bulldozers to knock them down.
And the "Not gonna happen" concept has already led to SIXTY YEARS of an ongoing conflict, which has increased in scope, not decreased.

Another words, something OTHER than the "not gonna happen" policy has to be applied.

The gypsies can go back to their homeland of Jordan and Egypt if they don't like the current situation or the options that are presented to them.

They had a chance for a new homeland (a generous offer btw) and they decided that the status quo of violent conflict was preferred. That generous offer is now off the table and they have no one but themselves to blame.

Israel is determined to survived...and bottom line is, with or without our assistance, they will.


SGT, they are not Gypsies, they are refugees. Their homeland is not Jordan or Egypt, anymore than those are YOUR homelands.

If I forcibly evicted you from your home, then after decades of fighting about that crime, offered you another piece of land, i.e. NOT your original piece, would you take that?
Well, they chose not to; and considering they have nothing left to lose, they will continue to fight on.

Yes, Israel might "survive" but is that any way to live? Would you enjoy living where you are constantly looking for a missile or a suicide bomber? Not likely.

And you have avoided my American point of view question: WHY SHOULD AMERICAN SOLDIERS / MARINES DIE TO DEFEND THIS ISRAELI CRIME?
 
Posts: 1539 | Registered: Tue 09 October 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I am very surprised, and even dissappointed that barely anyone is interested in discussing this topic. Per our number one "enemy", the Palestinian oppression / occupation is what they are fighting us for. So, when the reason for the conflict is put forth THAT CLEARLY, unlike the mixed generalities, and twisted concepts which our media outlets tell us, aren't YOU a bit disgusted that AMERICANS are dying to defend the Israeli CRIMES, which would appropriately be called CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY!!??
I do not belive the country of Freedom and justice for ALL should be defending one groups' oppression of another.
AND, considering we should not want to have a "War on Terrorism" forever, aren't you just a tad interested in a way to end it? According to our enemy, if we stopped supporting their oppressors in their crimes against humanity, they would no longer have such a hatred for us that they are inspired to commit suicide to kill as many of us as they can. Sounds like a healthy step to me! And considering the last 60 years of conflict over these injustices have not accomplished anything except an INCREASE in hostilities toward US, obviously SOMETHING NEW should be tried. DON'T YOU THINK SO TOO?
 
Posts: 1539 | Registered: Tue 09 October 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DougSabbag:
I am very surprised, and even dissappointed that barely anyone is interested in discussing this topic. Per our number one "enemy", the Palestinian oppression / occupation is what they are fighting us for. So, when the reason for the conflict is put forth THAT CLEARLY, unlike the mixed generalities, and twisted concepts which our media outlets tell us, aren't YOU a bit disgusted that AMERICANS are dying to defend the Israeli CRIMES, which would appropriately be called CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY!!??
I do not belive the country of Freedom and justice for ALL should be defending one groups' oppression of another.
AND, considering we should not want to have a "War on Terrorism" forever, aren't you just a tad interested in a way to end it? According to our enemy, if we stopped supporting their oppressors in their crimes against humanity, they would no longer have such a hatred for us that they are inspired to commit suicide to kill as many of us as they can. Sounds like a healthy step to me! And considering the last 60 years of conflict over these injustices have not accomplished anything except an INCREASE in hostilities toward US, obviously SOMETHING NEW should be tried. DON'T YOU THINK SO TOO?
And when I picture the proud honorable US Marines, and soldiers DYING to defend the Israeli crimes against the people whose lands they stole, (nobody had the right to give it to them), I am absolutely sickened.
The American military should ONLY fight for GOOD and HONORABLE reasons, not to defend a religious group in its Zionist insanity.
 
Posts: 1539 | Registered: Tue 09 October 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Super Member
Picture of Sgt_Schlappy
Posted Hide Post
quote:
And you have avoided my American point of view question: WHY SHOULD AMERICAN SOLDIERS / MARINES DIE TO DEFEND THIS ISRAELI CRIME?

Because it is a flawed and provocative question that isn't really worth addressing.
 
Posts: 21119 | Registered: Mon 22 April 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
The REASONS for Americans to be in harms way, will ALWAYS be "worth" addressing.
Some people just don't have the ability to question authority; and like lemmings to the sea, die "as directed".
 
Posts: 1539 | Registered: Tue 09 October 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
So, ONE MORE TIME AMERICANS:

Osama Bin Laden has described, very clearly, what their "issue" is with Americans.

This is the leader of the main group which orchestrated "9/11", and which we have expended over a trillion dollars, and lost over 4000 American marines / soldiers lives for, so far.

This would seem to me to be worthy of some discussion.

You may read the text of the translation at the beginning of this thread; but the bottom line is quite clearly that they are fighting the oppressive occupation forces of Israel, AND their supporters, i.e., America.

So, as an American, I have to ask: Do we want to die in the defense of Zionism, i.e., the theft and illegal occupation of land for a Jewish State?

I can well understand that the Israeli / Jewish lobbiests have a very strong hand on our American politicians thereby keeping them on "their side"; but, do we Americans want to knowingly allow ourselves to be part of the Zionist movement even as it continues the "War on Terrorism"?

Wouldn't we rather do the "right thing", and think as Americans first, (not Jews), and support a just resolution, i.e., one in which both parties could actually accept, of the conflict between the Israelis and their victims. This would require the USA to stop being pro Israeli, and become pro "justice for all". Which SHOULD be a very easy philosophy / policy for America to conduct, considering that is part of our Bill of Rights, our Constitution, and even our Declaration of Independance. Not to mention the Magna Carta, etc.

Osama says we should stop the oppression. And you know what? I agree; and you too should agree, that we should.

ONLY if I was an Israeli, and therefore wanted to keep the lands we had stolen, i.e., not paid anyone for, would I have any interest in maintaining that stance. Well, I am an American not an Israeli; i.e., not a thief hoping to keep the stolen goods. So, as an American, I want us to stop supporting the oppressors, and thereby END OUR LOSSES IN THE WAR ON TERRORISM!
 
Posts: 1539 | Registered: Tue 09 October 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of PanzerMeister
Posted Hide Post
OBL's issue with you, is that you are not the right kind of Muslim. The rest, is rhetoric. If you buy it, you are as naive as Popsiq.

I see that you equal Zionism with theft. Can you look at the definition of Zionism, and explain the connection?


"WHY SHOULD AMERICAN SOLDIERS / MARINES DIE TO DEFEND THIS ISRAELI CRIME?"

Lets me rephrase it.

Why should Israeli soldiers die in order to defend USA citizens, which are clearly committing crimes?

This question, matches yours in rhetoric and logic.

Can you answer it?

Do you support peace negotiations? OBL does not. Do you support peace? OBL does not.
I can barely fathom out the reasons for using this maniac as credible source for the discussion.
 
Posts: 1954 | Registered: Fri 27 July 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DougSabbag:
Zionism is an international political movement that originally supported the reestablishment of a homeland for the Jewish People in Palestine (Hebrew: Eretz Yisra'el, “the Land of Israel”), and continues primarily as support for the modern state of Israel.[1]

Although its origins are earlier, the movement was formally established by the Austro-Hungarian journalist Theodor Herzl in the late 19th century. The movement was eventually successful in establishing Israel in 1948, as the world's first and only modern Jewish State. Described as a "diaspora nationalism,"[2] its proponents regard it as a national liberation movement whose aim is the self-determination of the Jewish people.[3]

While Zionism is based in part upon religious tradition linking the Jewish people to the Land of Israel, where the concept of Jewish nationhood is thought to have first evolved somewhere between 1200 BCE and the late Second Temple era (i.e. up to 70 CE),[4][5] the modern movement was mainly secular, beginning largely as a response by European Jewry to antisemitism across Europe.[6] It constituted a branch of the broader phenomenon of modern nationalism.[7] At first one of several Jewish political movements offering alternative responses to the position of Jews in Europe, Zionism gradually gained more support, and after the Holocaust became the dominant Jewish political movement.

The word "Zionism" itself is derived from the word "Zion" (Hebrew: ציון, Tzi-yon), one of the names of Jerusalem and the Land of Israel, as mentioned in the Bible:

and the ransomed of the LORD shall return, and come to Zion with songs and everlasting joy upon their heads: they shall obtain joy and gladness, and sorrow and sighing shall flee away.(Isaiah 35:10)

It was coined as a term for Jewish nationalism by Austrian Jewish publisher Nathan Birnbaum, founder of the first nationalist Jewish students' movement Kadimah, in his journal Selbstemanzipation (Self Emancipation) in 1890. (Birnbaum eventually turned against political Zionism and became the first secretary-general of the anti-Zionist Haredi movement Agudat Israel.)[8]

Certain individuals and groups have used the term "Zionism" as a pejorative to justify attacks on Jews. According to historians Walter Laqueur, Howard Sachar and Jack Fischel among others, the label "Zionist" is in some cases also used as a euphemism for Jews in general by apologists for antisemitism.[9]

Zionism can be distinguished from Territorialism, a Jewish nationalist movement calling for a Jewish homeland not necessarily in Palestine. During the early history of Zionism, a number of proposals were made for settling Jews outside of Europe, but ultimately all of these were rejected or failed. The debate over these proposals helped to define the nature and focus of the Zionist movement.

Since the first century CE most Jews have lived in exile, although there has been a constant presence of Jews in the Land of Israel (Eretz Israel). According to Judaism, Eretz Israel, or Zion, is a land promised to the Jews by God according to the Bible. Following the 2nd century Bar Kokhba revolt, Jews were expelled from Palestine to form the Jewish diaspora. In the nineteenth century a current in Judaism supporting a return grew in popularity. Even before 1897, which is generally seen as the year in which practical Zionism started, Jews immigrated to Palestine, the pre-Zionist Aliyah.[10]

Jewish immigration to Palestine started in earnest in 1882. The so-called First Aliyah saw the arrival of about 30,000 Jews over twenty years. Most immigrants came from Russia, where anti-semitism was rampant. They founded a number of agricultural settlements with financial support from Jewish philanthropists in Western Europe. The Second Aliyah started in 1904. Further Aliyahs followed between the two World Wars, fueled in the 1930s by Nazi persecution.

In the 1890s Theodor Herzl infused Zionism with a new and practical urgency. He brought the World Zionist Organization into being and, together with Nathan Birnbaum, planned its First Congress at Basel in 1897.[12] This current in Zionism is known as political Zionism because it aimed at reaching a political agreement with the Power ruling Palestine. Up to 1917 this was the Ottoman Empire, and then until 1948 it was Britain on behalf of the League of Nations. The WZO also supported small scale settlement in Palestine.

Lobbying by Chaim Weizmann (cultural Zionists) and others culminated in the Balfour Declaration of 1917 by the British government. This declaration endorsed the creation of a Jewish Homeland in Palestine. In 1922, the League of nations endorsed the declaration in the Mandate it gave to Britain:

The Mandatory (…) will secure the establishment of the Jewish national home, as laid down in the preamble, and the development of self-governing institutions, and also for safeguarding the civil and religious rights of all the inhabitants of Palestine, irrespective of race and religion.[13]

Palestinian Arabs resisted Zionist migration. There were riots in 1920, 1921 and 1929, sometimes accompanied by massacres of Jews. Britain supported Jewish immigration in principle, but in reaction to Arab violence imposed restrictions on Jewish immigration.

The1936-1939 Arab revolt in Palestine led the British to establish the Peel Commission to investigate the situation. The commission called for a two-state solution and compulsory transfer of populations. This solution was rejected by the British and instead the White Paper of 1939 proposed an end to Jewish immigration by 1944, with a further 75,000 to be admitted by then. In principle, the British stuck to this policy until the end of the Mandate.

After WWII and the Holocaust, support for Zionism among Jews and Gentiles increased. The British were attacked in Palestine by Zionist groups because of restrictions on Jewish immigration, the best known attack being the 1946 King David Hotel bombing. Unable to resolve the conflict, the British referred the issue to the newly created United Nations.

In 1947, the UNSCOP recommended the partition of western Palestine into a Jewish state, an Arab state and a UN-controlled territory (Corpus separatum) around Jerusalem.[14] This partition plan was adopted on November 29th, 1947 with UN GA Resolution 181, 33 votes in favor, 13 against, and 10 abstentions. The vote itself, which required a two-third majority, was a very dramatic affair and led to celebrations in the streets of Jewish cities.[15]

The Arab states rejected the UN decision, demanding a single state with an Arab majority. violence immediately exploded in Palestine between Jews and Arabs. On 14 May 1948, at the end of the British mandate, the Jewish Agency, led by Ben-Gurion declared the creation of the State of Israel and the same day, the armies of four[16] Arab countries invaded Palestine.

During the following eight months, Israel forces defended the Jewish partition and conquered portions of the Arab partition, enlarging its portion to 78 percent of mandatory Palestine. The conflict led to an exodus of about 711,000 Arab Palestinians [17], of whom about 46.000 were internally displaced persons in Israel. The war ended with the 1949 Armistice Agreements, which included new cease-fire lines, the so-called Green line.

After the war the Arabs continued to reject Israel's right to exist and demanded that it retreat to the 1947 partition lines. They sustained this demand until 1967 when the rest of western Palestine was conquered by Israel during the Six-Day War, after which Arab states demanded that Israel retreat to the 1949 green line, the only "borders" currently recognized by the international community. These borders are commonly referred as the "pre-1967 borders". The border with Egypt was legalized in the 1979 Egyptian-Israeli Peace Treaty, and the border with Jordan in the 1994 Israel-Jordan Treaty of Peace.

After the creation of the State of Israel the WZO continued to exist as an organisation dedicated to assisting and encouraging Jews to migrate to Israel, as well as providing political support for Israel.


No where in here is there any mention of BUYING the land which these people decided to create a nation in. So, if you create an organized movement to create a State comprised of land, with people living in it, BUT don't BUY THE LAND, what would you call that acquisition of the land? Do you think it was just free land? How about all the people who were basically evicted from their homes? They lost their homes, and their land was given to the Jewish Settlers. But, were they PAID for their lost homes? No.

If you evicted me from my home, and then took control of my land, I would call that theft.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: DougSabbag,
 
Posts: 1539 | Registered: Tue 09 October 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PanzerMeister:
OBL's issue with you, is that you are not the right kind of Muslim. The rest, is rhetoric. If you buy it, you are as naive as Popsiq.

I see that you equal Zionism with theft. Can you look at the definition of Zionism, and explain the connection?


"WHY SHOULD AMERICAN SOLDIERS / MARINES DIE TO DEFEND THIS ISRAELI CRIME?"

Lets me rephrase it.

Why should Israeli soldiers die in order to defend USA citizens, which are clearly committing crimes?

This question, matches yours in rhetoric and logic.

Can you answer it?

Do you support peace negotiations? OBL does not. Do you support peace? OBL does not.
I can barely fathom out the reasons for using this maniac as credible source for the discussion.


I do not understand your question about Israeli soldiers defending Americans. As far a I know, Americans are defending Americans.

Osama Bin Laden seems to support the return of the lands stolen by Israel to the victims of that theft. You are absolutely correct, he does not seem to attempt to accomplish that through peaceful methods. But, Israel has not acquired these lands through peaceful methods, and does not retain the ownership through peaceful methods, either.

So, Israel is receiving violent attacks against their occupation of land which they stole.
Is that surprising? Is it only acceptable to respond peacefully to violent invasions / occupations?

Osama Bin Laden represents one of MANY organized groups attacking Israel. All of them hate the occupation forces of Israel in their midst. Is that surprising?

The reason I am discussing this recent declaration from Osama Bin Laden, is that he clearly states what his groups' goal is. And that is the "liberation" of the Palestinians from the Israeli occupation.

Now, considering that the United States is involved in what we are calling the "War on Terrorism", which is a war against the groups like the one led by Osama Bin Laden, this stated goal of Osama Bin Ladens would seem to me to be very important to take into consideration if you did want to enter into any negotiations to end this war.

This recent statement, clarifying his goals, is in conflict with what our Western Media outlets keep telling us. They keep telling us that these groups want to kill us because they don't like our lifestyle. Well, this Bin Laden statement more clearly defines their purpose, than that nebulous one. And it sure does make a lot more sense that people would commit suicide in order to retaliate against a forced occupation, than just because they don't like our lifestyle.

This is very important to understand in America, considering we are being led astray as to the reasons for "9/11" and this war. And if we don't understand the reasons for the war in the first place, how can we ever really end it?
 
Posts: 1539 | Registered: Tue 09 October 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of PanzerMeister
Posted Hide Post
But they did buy the land...

However, i must point one important fact. Zionism, or at the very least his unofficial spirit is dead. It is dead and rotting, one (but not the sole one) of the reasons for it, is our failed system of education.

Back to topic:

1)Israel acquired the land via peaceful methods, until independence war. Jews suffered attacks from local Arabs at the very least from 1920-ies, far before they stole anything.

2)During Independence war, which happened after Arabs decided to finish Hitlers handiwork, we took forcefully some lands. Arabs, did that too. Further more, they have evicted Jews from their homes and seized their property, a fact which is conveniently ignored.

3)To tell you the truth, i do not understand your question either "WHY SHOULD AMERICAN SOLDIERS / MARINES DIE TO DEFEND THIS ISRAELI CRIME?" Where does it happen? Iraq? This is your own war, and while we supported it, and continue to do so, we hardly caused it.

4)I do not belong to the kind of people that negotiate with OBL goons. I do not care what he wants, nor will i listen to him. If he wanted to talk, he would have talked. Instead he bombed WTC in 1993, right during the Oslo peace process.

OBL is a liar, and hopes for people to have short memory.
 
Posts: 1954 | Registered: Fri 27 July 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PanzerMeister:
But they did buy the land...

However, i must point one important fact. Zionism, or at the very least his unofficial spirit is dead. It is dead and rotting, one (but not the sole one) of the reasons for it, is our failed system of education.

Back to topic:

1)Israel acquired the land via peaceful methods, until independence war. Jews suffered attacks from local Arabs at the very least from 1920-ies, far before they stole anything.

2)During Independence war, which happened after Arabs decided to finish Hitlers handiwork, we took forcefully some lands. Arabs, did that too. Further more, they have evicted Jews from their homes and seized their property, a fact which is conveniently ignored.

3)To tell you the truth, i do not understand your question either "WHY SHOULD AMERICAN SOLDIERS / MARINES DIE TO DEFEND THIS ISRAELI CRIME?" Where does it happen? Iraq? This is your own war, and while we supported it, and continue to do so, we hardly caused it.

4)I do not belong to the kind of people that negotiate with OBL goons. I do not care what he wants, nor will i listen to him. If he wanted to talk, he would have talked. Instead he bombed WTC in 1993, right during the Oslo peace process.

OBL is a liar, and hopes for people to have short memory.

OK, so there is some agreement that within the creation of Israel, there have been innocent civilians displaced from their homes, without compensation. Many of these "displaced" people are called "refugees". These people are upset that they have been screwed out of their homes so that the Jews could have them for free. I would be very upset about that too. This is obviously a great way to perpetuate whatever ill feelings already existed between the Jews who created Israel and the Palestinians / Arabs / people who lost their homes.

The connection between American soldiers and defending these Israeli "crimes", is established from our ongoing support of Israel.
We provide billions of dollars, both from our government, and from many American Jews to Israel. We also provide a great deal of military hardware to Israel. And America is Israels' biggest defender in the United Nations. So, from the point of view of Israels' victims or occupied / refugees, America is an extension of Israel against them! For many years the various groups fighting Israel did not directly associate and attack America for their support of Israel. They probably did not want to receive any direct retaliation from America so wisely did not provoke us. However, after decades of getting nowhere, as the frustration level has continued to increase, these groups eventually brought their issues directly to the supporters of their enemy, i.e. America. This shift began before 9/11, but that was the most egregious act so far, and received the most response from America.
America began their "War on Terrorism" after in response to that.
So, with all of that happening from our support of Israel, against their victims, I think there is a very direct connection of our American soldiers / marines who are in this "War on Terrorism" because of American support of Israel.
Without American support of the biggest disruption in the Middle East, i.e., Israel, the fighting groups (Al Qaida, etc.) would not have anywhere near as clear a reason to dislike, and attack America.

 
Posts: 1539 | Registered: Tue 09 October 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Mr. Panzermeister, not to beat a horse to death, but following the link you provided on the subject of paying for the land, it eventually led to this:

"The Jewish National Fund (Hebrew: קרן קימת לישראל, Keren Kayemet LeYisrael) (abbreviated as JNF, and sometimes KKL) was founded in 1901 to buy and develop land in Palestine (later Israel) for Jewish settlement. By 2006, it owned 14% of the total land in Israel."

So, ONLY 14% was bought??!! What about the other 86%? How was that land acquired?

As anyone can see, the formation of Israel was accomplished at the expense of others. Many of those "others" are called refugees, and are upset.

When you take something which is not yours, and do not pay for it, that is called theft. And, at the VERY LEAST, you will have made an enemy in the person(s) you stole from.

Until the victims / refugees are compensated to a degree which satisfies them, they will remain your enemies. Any others, (America), who support this crime, are implicated in that crime.

And I don't believe America should be implicated in criminal behaviour. We are supposed to be better than that.

Only our foolish arrogance has us believing we can support a criminal act and "get away with it", i.e., not face any retaliation. Even being the most powerful nation on Earth, we can not be a party to the oppression of millions of people who were forcibly evicted from their homes, and "get away with it".

And as an American, I surely do not want to continue to try to fight our way through any retaliation for these criminal acts to humanity.

We must stop this, in order to stop the War on Terrorism. The only other alternative is to somehow accomplish killing every single one of the "victims" of these crimes so that nobody could complain or fight us about it, anymore.
Well, even America can not kill every single one of these people. So, we have to eventually deal with them, honorably and justly.
The sooner we do, the sooner this "War on Terrorism" is done.
 
Posts: 1539 | Registered: Tue 09 October 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of PanzerMeister
Posted Hide Post
Keren Kayemet is hardly the only fund dedicated to buying the land. There were private citizens that owned the land, and later they gave it to Israel Government.

Some of the land in MPalestine was No-mans land, and as such it could been given to us.

The overall amount of stolen land is far less than your estimates.
 
Posts: 1954 | Registered: Fri 27 July 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PanzerMeister:
Keren Kayemet is hardly the only fund dedicated to buying the land. There were private citizens that owned the land, and later they gave it to Israel Government.

Some of the land in MPalestine was No-mans land, and as such it could been given to us.

The overall amount of stolen land is far less than your estimates.


Well, obviously it is enough stolen land to not only create Israel, but to inspire the victims / losers to commit suicide to retaliate against their oppressors. And, it is surely not just a couple of house lots, or the relatively affluent Israelis would have PAID for it a LONG TIME AGO.
 
Posts: 1539 | Registered: Tue 09 October 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Super Member
Picture of Sgt_Schlappy
Posted Hide Post
Do the Palestinians have receipts from when they "bought" the land? I didn't think so.

The gypsies should be thankful that Israel hasn't expelled them completely, which is what they deserve IMO.
 
Posts: 21119 | Registered: Mon 22 April 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Middle East    Osama Bin Laden: Palestinian cause fuels war

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.