Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Freemasons In The Military    Can you say things here?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Veteran Member
Picture of USNGunner1
Posted
I've removed all my posts, concerning Charles. since we have a brother that believes he should send all our posting to our Grand Lodges, I always thought that this was a safe harbor. Any brothers
that would like to communicate with me feel free to email me. I will be back after I after I scan my last Grand Lodge Communication concerning Prince Hall and my written Proxy to my Sr Warden to vote No.
Fraternally
Bryan

This message has been edited. Last edited by: USNGunner1,
 
Posts: 314 | Registered: Mon 25 June 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Hot Topics Moderator
Picture of TerryTCT
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by USNGunner1:
My question is can you say something, have a debate stay respectful and stay here or is it right for someone to take these conversations to your Grand Lodge? Should this brother contacted me first before going to the Grand Secretary?
Bryan
quote:


It was stated: Concrete in California, our Grand lodge does not recognize lodges or Grand Lodges that does not recognize Prince Hall Masons.
GAC: Your Grand Secretary disagrees with you.


quote:

Indeed, the Grand Secretary of California advises this is not a correct statement.


quote:

The Grand Secretary e-mailed me 1 May.

In reply: I direct your attention to the general rules of this forum. I have posted an applicable summary of them below. With regards to your question, advice cannot be given, however, use your best judgement in the course of action you take. (See summary of general guidelines below):

"Topics that are Masonically reserved for a tyled meeting are prohibited. Keep a civil tone. Do not post hostile messages, flames, or use sarcasm to incite negative emotions. Known Masons must behave in this forum as if you are in Lodge. All others are encouraged to be respectful of everyone else. Respect the fact that not all forum members share the same views or Masonic viewpoints.

- Postings should be in the spirit of Freemasonry, and be of interest to the general Forum. Use common sense and avoid distasteful or disturbing posts. Again, behave as you would in lodge.

- We will not tolerate any discussion or opinion that suggests that Masons are superior or inferior to anyone, or non-Masons to treat Masons with disrespect. This does not mean that these issues cannot be discussed, but we must ensure that they are kept as harmonious as possible.

- Criticisms Of Freemasonry - While this is predominantly a forum for Masons, we recognize the occasion when non-Masons seeking information, or desire to enter into discussion on this forum. However, an attack on any Mason or Freemasonry will subject violators to removal from the forum. Also, please avoid SHOUTING on this forum.

- Please remember that all members are responsible for any messages they post. The poster is also responsible for links posted to external websites, however, this forum does not expressly or implicitly sponsor, support or condone sites linked to messages by its members or administrators.

- Disclaimer: This message expresses the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of the forum or website, but is general guidelines to follow. Anyone who feels that a poster have posted an objectionable message is encouraged to contact me or any moderator immediately by email. As a moderator, I have the ability to remove objectionable messages and objectionable posters and I will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if it determined that removal is necessary.

Fraternally,
/s/
Terry, PM
Freemason
Major, U.S. Army (Ret.)
Hot Topics Moderator
 
Posts: 508 | Registered: Sun 04 February 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
My Brother, I do not see what alternative one had in this situation. You stated clearly that you were presenting concrete facts on the subject. Even when others stated that they believed you were in error, you continued to insist that your facts were accurate. So, what choice did one have but to check your facts at the source?

I don't think it was done with melicious intent. I believe it was only done to confirm the facts you were insisting were accurate. Any time I comment on my Grand Lodges rules, I prefer to quote the section of our code that supports my statement. This allows me to find out if my statement is accurate before I make it.

It's all good Brother. Live, learn, love.
 
Posts: 42 | Registered: Fri 23 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
Brother,

I would not have contacted your GL because frankly, what GLofCA does is no concern to me. However, the other Brother in question felt he needed to get confirmation from your GL. I don't feel his intent was malicious, but I am not involved. I suggest you both communicate and work it out as Brothers Privately. That is what I would do. The internet leaves a lot of room for miscommunication. I wish you both the best of luck as you work this out together.
 
Posts: 42 | Registered: Fri 23 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
FYI, your integrity was never in question with me and there is no need to prove your word. You did that at the altar as far as I am concerned.
 
Posts: 42 | Registered: Fri 23 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Hot Topics Moderator
Picture of TerryTCT
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BroAPeterson:
My Brother, I do not see what alternative one had in this situation. You stated clearly that you were presenting concrete facts on the subject. Even when others stated that they believed you were in error, you continued to insist that your facts were accurate. So, what choice did one have but to check your facts at the source?

I don't think it was done with melicious intent. I believe it was only done to confirm the facts you were insisting were accurate. Any time I comment on my Grand Lodges rules, I prefer to quote the section of our code that supports my statement. This allows me to find out if my statement is accurate before I make it.

It's all good Brother. Live, learn, love.


quote:
Originally posted by BroAPeterson:
FYI, your integrity was never in question with me and there is no need to prove your word. You did that at the altar as far as I am concerned.

I agree with the poster. Keep in mind that there are Masons and non-Masons on this forum, along with cowans and eavesdroppers, so govern yourselves accordingly. This reminds me of a saying that a wise attorney once told me and it goes like this, "Never say or do anything that you would not want read in open court."

Fraternally and sincerely,
/s/
Terry, PM
Freemason
Hot Topics Moderator
 
Posts: 508 | Registered: Sun 04 February 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
To be clear, I didn't forward any e-mails. I didn't give the poster's name when I discussed it with the Grand Secretary. I didn't even give the name of the e-mail list.

This was an issue affecting my jurisdiction and it did not appear the Cal GL Proceedings had been issued. Consequently, I believe the contact was appopriate and discreet. I did not send a formal letter, but an informal inquiry. I don't believe I could have been more low key in correcting the error.

I must say that if the brother had been correct, the Conference of Grand Masters would have been much more entertaining as letters withdrawing recognition were being mailed across the world.

FWIW, I believe the confusion was because the brother did not attend Grand Lodge. It is my understanding from discussing this with another senior brother at the AASR Leadership Conference in Seattle that the matter was on the agenda, but was not approved.

G.A. Cook
 
Posts: 13 | Registered: Sun 20 January 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Hot Topics Moderator
Picture of TerryTCT
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cookslc:
To be clear, I didn't forward any e-mails. I didn't give the poster's name when I discussed it with the Grand Secretary. I didn't even give the name of the e-mail list.

This was an issue affecting my jurisdiction and it did not appear the Cal GL Proceedings had been issued. Consequently, I believe the contact was appopriate and discreet. I did not send a formal letter, but an informal inquiry. I don't believe I could have been more low key in correcting the error.

I must say that if the brother had been correct, the Conference of Grand Masters would have been much more entertaining as letters withdrawing recognition were being mailed across the world.

FWIW, I believe the confusion was because the brother did not attend Grand Lodge. It is my understanding from discussing this with another senior brother at the AASR Leadership Conference in Seattle that the matter was on the agenda, but was not approved.

G.A. Cook

Brother: So noted. Remember, one never has to be defensive among his brethren unless in a trial of his peers. Let the chip fall where they may, everyone has to answer to someone. There is another saying that applies here and it goes like this: "If you do the right thing, you can't go wrong."

Fraternally,
/s/
Terry, PM
Freemason
Hot Topics Moderator
 
Posts: 508 | Registered: Sun 04 February 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Hot Topics Moderator
Picture of TerryTCT
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TerryTCT:
quote:
Originally posted by cookslc:
To be clear, I didn't forward any e-mails. I didn't give the poster's name when I discussed it with the Grand Secretary. I didn't even give the name of the e-mail list.

This was an issue affecting my jurisdiction and it did not appear the Cal GL Proceedings had been issued. Consequently, I believe the contact was appopriate and discreet. I did not send a formal letter, but an informal inquiry. I don't believe I could have been more low key in correcting the error.

I must say that if the brother had been correct, the Conference of Grand Masters would have been much more entertaining as letters withdrawing recognition were being mailed across the world.

FWIW, I believe the confusion was because the brother did not attend Grand Lodge. It is my understanding from discussing this with another senior brother at the AASR Leadership Conference in Seattle that the matter was on the agenda, but was not approved.

G.A. Cook

Brother: So noted. Remember, one never has to be defensive among his brethren unless in a trial of his peers. Let the chip fall where they may, everyone has to answer to someone. There is another saying that applies here and it goes like this: "If you do the right thing, you can't go wrong."

Fraternally,
/s/
Terry, PM
Freemason
Hot Topics Moderator

OK, I stand corrected via PM which means Private Message, not Past Master. LOL
Fraternally and sincerely,
/s/
Terry, PM
Freemason
Hot Topics Moderator
 
Posts: 508 | Registered: Sun 04 February 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
Because a PM would never correct, would he? <BFG>
 
Posts: 13 | Registered: Sun 20 January 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Hot Topics Moderator
Picture of TerryTCT
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cookslc:
Because a PM would never correct, would he? <BFG>

Never say never my friend. Nothing in life is permanent except an appointment with the grim reaper.
F & S
Terry, PM
Freemason
Hot Topics Moderator
 
Posts: 508 | Registered: Sun 04 February 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic Training
Posted Hide Post
Just surfing through. Thought I'd say hello to my brothers out there. I had a pretty diesent profile but it's all been erased after not logging in for over a year I guess, oh well:| Travel Light!
Bro Steve Walter
Botetourt#7 AFAM
Urbanna #83 RoyalArch
US Coast Guard GM1
 
Posts: 2 | Registered: Thu 03 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Freemasons In The Military    Can you say things here?

© 2008 Military Advantage, Inc.