Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
New Member
Picture of ZYoung
Posted
RE: http://tech.military.com/equipment/view/88646/bayonet.html?eq_id=88646

Personally, I wish the edges are sharp when used as a standalone weapon.
 
Posts: 5 | Registered: Thu 04 October 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
The edge was left as it is so that it will pass the 1917 (I think) string test. The rough edge will cut/tear through the string better than a sharp edge (so I have been told). Never done it, just relaying what I've been told during my 23 yrs.
 
Posts: 4 | Registered: Wed 16 April 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of simonferrer
Posted Hide Post
Isn't it about time we ditched that overpriced piece of crap M-9 bayonet? You can argue "rough edge" all you want, but if they're going to sell it to the Army as a 'field and general utility knife' then they might at least make it ground thin enough to actually take an edge. Otherwise, it's an extra pound that just takes up room in my 'B' bag back in the rear.
Indeed, the whole idea of a bayonet on an M4 carbine is just silly, anyway. How're supposed to use a bayonet on a carbine, anyway; wave it in one hand like a sword?
 
Posts: 486 | Registered: Wed 16 April 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of nuka_cola_chaser
Posted Hide Post
If your all hardcore, I think you can get a bayonet adapter for the M4... why would you want to do that, is anyones guess.
 
Posts: 167 | Registered: Thu 16 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of ozzy37F
Posted Hide Post
Hell lets just carry a short sword.
 
Posts: 88 | Registered: Sat 19 January 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 


© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.