Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Guest Commentary    The Evolution of Combat Exclusion
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
New Member
Picture of mattkay4
Posted
RE: http://www.military.com/opinion/0,15202,175985,00.html

“Combat exclusion kept women from the most hazardous positions for many years. The most dramatic shift to more combat related duties came from pushes on several fronts, including the National Organization for Women (representing the desires of women in the military), The Defense Advisory Committee for Women in the Service (DACOWITS) and the Department of Defense Task Force on Women in the Military."

"Those organizations pushed for greater career opportunities, responsible positions, etc., to help women be more competitive for promotion. However, with those opportunities came increasing risks to life and limb."

The author forgot to add a line or two about the increasing risk to those organizations when a woman succeeds and reaches new heights of position and power, but has a different ideology that is in conflict with the supporting organization. This can threaten the leadership of the organization, forcing the leadership to either abandon the woman (subsequently discrediting her to protect the organization, and yet displaying an ulterior agenda) or support the woman (thus displaying and acting in accordance with the stated goals of the organization). Depending on how the organization reacts will determine the genuineness and legitimacy of the stated goals. The risk can be susbstantial to an organization that acts against the stated goals and agenda.
 
Posts: 225 | Registered: Thu 26 April 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
New Member
Posted Hide Post
What valid organization would allow someone with a different ideology than that of the group as a whole (regardless of gender) to rise to a leadership position where they could potentially have such great effects?

Or, if the person changed beliefs once in the position of power, how does their gender affect what steps should be taken if they are no longer fulfilling the role they were intended to fill?
 
Posts: 2 | Registered: Tue 23 November 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
Member
Posted Hide Post
I agree on the allowance of women in combat posititions as long as the standards are the same across the board for men and women without sacrificing the intent of the standard.

The DoD will have to work around caveats like making equal ratings points for PT scores for men and women.

The whole pregnancy thing is also a force diminisher when it comes to some job descriptions, but I don't have an answer for that one yet.
 
Posts: 578 | Registered: Sun 15 October 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Guest Commentary    The Evolution of Combat Exclusion

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.