Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Guest Commentary    Serivces Failing Testing Test
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
New Member
Posted
RE: http://www.military.com/opinion/0,15202,175269,00.html

Once again, Col Stevens has hit the nail on the head. Too often, the services have to "react" to a situation they find themselves with---personnel unfit, for whatever reason, for military service. This is a huge cost in time, effort, and infrastructure costs. Col Stevens has offered some good thoughts on saving valuable dollars for other things.

Dale G Johnson, San Antonio, TX
 
Posts: 1 | Registered: Thu 11 September 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Agree! Colonel Stevens is right on target. It's past time for the military to catch up to industry standard. As stated, many fortune 500 companies have been using assessment testing with resounding success. The benchmark is set. It's time to redirect these wasted dollars to better serve those who so bravely defend our great Nation.
 
Posts: 1 | Registered: Sun 01 June 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
New Member
Posted Hide Post
The savings alone justify someone taking a close look at how we can be more effective. We are not a fortune 500 company but we can and should review their methods and results. Big business will tell you that hiring the wrong person costs on average 4 times the annual salary. Get someone who is unbiased to review the ASVAB results and the results of other tests and move towards hiring the best person for the military. Col Terry Stevens has a unique point of view and always has the best interest of the military first.

Bob Glisson
 
Posts: 1 | Registered: Thu 11 September 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
New Member
Posted Hide Post
You touch on an issue I have long thought we needed: an ethics tool (for lack of a better term). Let's face it, some folks may have all the potential in the world, but can't hack the stringent ethical standards.

You also mention measuring tenacity/commitment. Most measures traditionally correlate 'ability to succeed' with a high school diploma. I personally know many who received their GED during times of adversity whose commitment far outpaced some lackadasical HS diploma graduates.

Fran Martin
 
Posts: 37 | Registered: Thu 31 July 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
New Member
Posted Hide Post
The above comments were posted at the request of Fran Martin, Colonel, USAF (Retired)
 
Posts: 37 | Registered: Thu 31 July 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
New Member
Posted Hide Post
The army already offers one such test for any applicant that is less than a high school grad. It is called the AIMS Test. I am at a loss right now for what the acronym means.
 
Posts: 7 | Registered: Fri 06 April 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
New Member
Posted Hide Post
You may be referring to Arizona's Instrument to Measure Standards (AIMS), a Standards-Based test, that provides educators and the public with valuable information regarding the progress of Arizona's students toward mastering Arizona's reading, writing and mathematics Standards. The ASVAB also covers much of the above, but neither test compares with a wide-ranging personality/assessment test.
 
Posts: 37 | Registered: Thu 31 July 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete Message
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  Guest Commentary    Serivces Failing Testing Test

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.