Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    navy-lehman-obama
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
New Member
Posted
RE: http://www.military.com/forums/0,15240,192055,00.html

A more realistic goal is 280 ships to be kept afloat and effective (training & mission capable) as the current administration has kneecapped this country for the next century with debt.

As the soviets have been supplanted by the chinese as our nemesis (but the russians haven't gone away!) we are faced with the liklyhood that our fina'l mess will not allow us to effectively meet the challenges we will face from china and others in the mid and long-term future.

Folks, we are in trouble - pray for our nation!
 
Posts: 23 | Registered: Thu 07 August 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
aka Popsiq...banned for good
Posted Hide Post
This administration wasn't the one 'wasting' the resources of the country with defence of the Persian Gulf against the goatherds of Afghanistan and nasty sniping Iraqis in Fallujah.

How many aircraft carrier battle groups were deployed at the same time 3? 4? Against what?

And somebody thought this would go on forever? That no other contingecies would arise? Navies are notorious for developing themselves for themselve for bang-bang, and getting 'development' money as a result. But bad planning, and worse spending, started long, long before Obama.

But no fear, if Obama can get the Chinese to more buy bonds, he just might up-grade the fleet. Geez he's 'wasting' money on everything else.
 
Posts: 590 | Registered: Fri 16 January 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    navy-lehman-obama

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.