RE: http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,177712,00.html

Is it really nesessary to mention where the base is? "Defense officials" said they wanted to keep it quit for security reasons.

It is time to start treating some journalists as enemy agents and send them to jail.

quote:

Originally posted by 15240533:
RE: http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,177712,00.html

Is it really nesessary to mention where the base is? "Defense officials" said they wanted to keep it quit for security reasons.

It is time to start treating some journalists as enemy agents and send them to jail.

Yeah hang a bunch of 'em n throw that pesky Bill of Rights in the trash for good measure. Jeezes H doncha think them gomers doan't already know this?

quote:

Originally posted by Sand_Flea:

quote:

Originally posted by 15240533:
RE: http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,177712,00.html

Is it really nesessary to mention where the base is? "Defense officials" said they wanted to keep it quit for security reasons.

It is time to start treating some journalists as enemy agents and send them to jail.

Yeah hang a bunch of 'em n throw that pesky Bill of Rights in the trash for good measure. Jeezes H doncha think them gomers doan't already know this?

Yeah, who needs OPSEC anyway.

quote:

Originally posted by 15240533:
RE: http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,177712,00.html

Is it really nesessary to mention where the base is? "Defense officials" said they wanted to keep it quit for security reasons.

It is time to start treating some journalists as enemy agents and send them to jail.

Hate to burst any bubbles here, but by the time we civvies hear about something involving the military, the bad guys have known about it for some time. And anyone who thinks our intelligence community is better than others, is just full of themselves.