Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Army May Have to Borrow to Meet Payroll
Page 1 2 3 4 5 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
New Member
Posted
Laughable
 
Posts: 99 | Registered: Wed 28 September 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mocitytx:
Laughable


Do you have a story or Mil.com link to go with your comment?
 
Posts: 574 | Registered: Fri 22 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of athos20
Posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 381 | Registered: Sun 06 February 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
-------------------

Proud Member
Derelict Veterans'
Group

-------------------

Picture of L0A1
Posted Hide Post
How about OUTRAGEOUS.

Congress (Yes this means the Democrats not Bush, for once) needs to get off their collective A$$e$ and secure the troops pay.

quote:
Originally posted by mocitytx:
Laughable


Todays politics remind me of an old saying. - "Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas?" - Joseph Stalin
 
Posts: 8083 | Registered: Sat 03 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of GoldenSabers
Posted Hide Post
Brings to memory the previous Democrat threats/attempts to impede and force the "end" of the GWoT by denial of funding. Equally outrageous (laughable doesn't even describe...) is the possibilty that ONLY the pay to the troops is being held up and nothing else.

We'll see how dire this is allowed to become...
 
Posts: 684 | Registered: Mon 31 May 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of oldmole
Posted Hide Post
Why on earth should they be short in the pay accounts, for pity's sake? All military pay [not just the Army's] got covered in the regular Defense Appropriations Bill, with the possible exception of activated Guard and Reserve troops, and hazardous duty pay ... they shouldn't be running that short anywhere close to so soon. Cool
 
Posts: 10931 | Registered: Mon 05 June 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
This is ridicules. Hey I understand we have a line of credit with the Chinese.
 
Posts: 4169 | Registered: Thu 26 August 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
suspended pending review,Nemesis
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ol_Doc:
This is ridicules. Hey I understand we have a line of credit with the Chinese.


What does this quote from the article mean?

quote:
Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said Tuesday that if Congress does not pass the $1.8 billion Global War on Terror (GWOT) supplemental, the U.S. Army will be unable to pay troops in mid-June and may be forced to make a reprogramming request that would borrow from Navy and Air Force payroll funds.


It means that the administration has been been barrowing funds from the normal military appropriations without Congressional feedback or approval. You know, lying, violating the Constitution... Big Grin

And of course blaming the opposition! How creative!

Dave
 
Posts: 12526 | Registered: Fri 17 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"mouse"
Posted Hide Post
it this a joke.....too much incentives to stay in and NOT enough guts to do the right thing.......
 
Posts: 7620 | Registered: Sat 29 May 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
why not just tell the bad guys that we're out of bullets...maybe we can borrow some bullets from another country...Let's start pumping that Iraqi oil and putting it in our tanks, sell enough to pay our troops all a bonus...and quit *****-footing around. The GWOT is a threat to all freedom loving people..and I think OPEC is just as threatening as the Terrorist...maybe more so...putting the world in economic turmoil. Democrats wake up....what are you thinking.??
 
Posts: 8 | Registered: Tue 17 December 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by papakeck328:
why not just tell the bad guys that we're out of bullets...maybe we can borrow some bullets from another country...Let's start pumping that Iraqi oil and putting it in our tanks, sell enough to pay our troops all a bonus...and quit *****-footing around. The GWOT is a threat to all freedom loving people..and I think OPEC is just as threatening as the Terrorist...maybe more so...putting the world in economic turmoil. Democrats wake up....what are you thinking.??

Democrats wake up??? Who has been supporting the oil producers worldwide. Who's family does business with the Saudis? And, in fact, the Bin Laden family?
 
Posts: 4169 | Registered: Thu 26 August 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
it is too bad, if you vol. for four years in the army at the end of four years your contract is up but no you can get out, cause we dont have enought soldiers, so you have to stay in...wait a minute, my contract only calls for four years..ha...now you might not have the money to pay me in june...you might have to go to the sister services to borrow the money...ok what is wrong with this picture....
 
Posts: 1 | Registered: Sat 22 March 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member

Old Fart #00

Picture of JimSorber
Posted Hide Post
Hey, admit it...it sucks all the way around and is the result of abysmal planning!
 
Posts: 7738 | Registered: Thu 23 January 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
suspended pending review,Nemesis
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JimSorber:
Hey, admit it...it sucks all the way around and is the result of abysmal planning!


Perhaps, abysmal "deliberate" planning would be a more appropriate term. Military pay is a part of the normal military appropriations. The administration is now putting the opposition party on the spot, "either vote for our supplemental appropriation, or we will announce that you're against paying our men and woman in the military."

Neat!

Dave
 
Posts: 12526 | Registered: Fri 17 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Maybe we should try to find those billions we lost.
 
Posts: 1035 | Registered: Thu 11 October 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Suspended by Cat on 11/11/08
Posted Hide Post
This is great! My EAOS in less than a year... and if the Army borrowing money from the Navy's payroll funds mean that my pay is somehow affected by this... this could mean that people from ALL services could be walking!

Man, I tell you what - with gas prices, now this, among other things - has this country ever been in worse shape?
 
Posts: 1299 | Registered: Sun 02 July 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Yggdrasil:
This is great! My EAOS in less than a year... and if the Army borrowing money from the Navy's payroll funds mean that my pay is somehow affected by this... this could mean that people from ALL services could be walking!

Man, I tell you what - with gas prices, now this, among other things - has this country ever been in worse shape?


Unfortunately, yes.
 
Posts: 574 | Registered: Fri 22 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Doesn't surprise me in the least that the Army is out of money. what does surprise me is they may try to borrow from the Air Force, historically the most fiscally irresponsible of all the armed forces. The Army is the next most irresponsible and has been since WWII
 
Posts: 687 | Registered: Wed 07 May 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
A cure called impeachment would get it setteled real FAST!! Applause
 
Posts: 328 | Registered: Wed 29 June 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
All patroll funds are on deposit with the Treasury Dept.
Gates is log-rolling the issue. As per the Bush script blame anyone for anything, but at all costs absolve the administration. When the outcome is undesireable from the Bush-babies' perspective, invent an artificial catastrophy.
If Congress is as smart as they should be (to have gotten elected in the first place), they will call the bluff and not pass the supplemental appropriation. No funds for Iraq. No funds for "GWOT", another figment of their imagination. Terrorism is criminal behavior; treat it as such. They are criminals; don't elevate their status above common criminal.
This is Bush business as usual and needs to be met as a bluff and an outright lie.
 
Posts: 31 | Registered: Sun 20 March 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Army May Have to Borrow to Meet Payroll

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.