Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    US Electronic Fingerprints in Syria?

Moderators: mainedawg, NEMESIS1960, OldArmyLove, pipedreamsandbabies, Silent_Surface, more...
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Black8
New Member
Posted
RE: http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,166941,00.html

We should be doing the same thing on the border of the U.S. The American people are tired of being invaded by foreign forces.
 
Posts: 31 | Registered: Mon 28 February 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
popsiq
suspended 90 days as of 5/19/09
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Black8:
RE: http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,166941,00.html

We should be doing the same thing on the border of the U.S. The American people are tired of being invaded by foreign forces.


What does the government having capability to curtail your ability to live or communicate in a modern society have to do with being "invaded by foreign forces"? (Which, my history books tell me, hasn't occurred since Pancho Villa raided New Mexico in 1916.)

More telling the effect of foreign invasions. The last one, some 92 years ago, still makes some, like yourself, "sick". That's understandable, but Pancho only invaded for the afternoon and was forced to retreat. Imagine how an Afghan, or a Syrian, is going to feel.

Ditto if you're referring to immigrants.
 
Posts: 9726 | Registered: Wed 19 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
SUNLINER81
Super Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by popsiq:
quote:
Originally posted by Black8:
RE: http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,166941,00.html

We should be doing the same thing on the border of the U.S. The American people are tired of being invaded by foreign forces.


What does the government having capability to curtail your ability to live or communicate in a modern society have to do with being "invaded by foreign forces"? (Which, my history books tell me, hasn't occurred since Pancho Villa raided New Mexico in 1916.)

More telling the effect of foreign invasions. The last one, some 92 years ago, still makes some, like yourself, "sick". That's understandable, but Pancho only invaded for the afternoon and was forced to retreat. Imagine how an Afghan, or a Syrian, is going to feel.

Ditto if you're referring to immigrants.


ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81
 
Posts: 22583 | Registered: Thu 09 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
godawgz
Experienced Member
Picture of godawgz
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by popsiq:
quote:
Originally posted by Black8:
RE: http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,166941,00.html

We should be doing the same thing on the border of the U.S. The American people are tired of being invaded by foreign forces.


What does the government having capability to curtail your ability to live or communicate in a modern society have to do with being "invaded by foreign forces"? (Which, my history books tell me, hasn't occurred since Pancho Villa raided New Mexico in 1916.)

More telling the effect of foreign invasions. The last one, some 92 years ago, still makes some, like yourself, "sick". That's understandable, but Pancho only invaded for the afternoon and was forced to retreat. Imagine how an Afghan, or a Syrian, is going to feel.

Ditto if you're referring to immigrants.
Quit relying so heavily on books... many of them were written by liars.. of course never fear, they will eventually be revised or rewritten by other liars with different sensibilities and/or agendas.. in the meantime, it bothers me that these 'credible' sources have enough experience in these ops to be credible, but apparently not enough to know that sometimes they really oughtta keep their damn yaps shut.
 
Posts: 5625 | Registered: Thu 24 January 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
hoyasooner
New Member
Posted Hide Post
I've got to agree with popsiq here (first time for everything). The ability to short out enemy radar has nothing to do with Juan and Jose taking their pack mule across hundreds of miles of desert.

The only way to stop illegal immigration is to make Mexico not suck. That's a pretty tall order for US politicians.
 
Posts: 199 | Registered: Sun 21 May 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
brocknoland
New Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by popsiq:
quote:
Originally posted by Black8:
RE: http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,166941,00.html

We should be doing the same thing on the border of the U.S. The American people are tired of being invaded by foreign forces.


What does the government having capability to curtail your ability to live or communicate in a modern society have to do with being "invaded by foreign forces"? (Which, my history books tell me, hasn't occurred since Pancho Villa raided New Mexico in 1916.)

More telling the effect of foreign invasions. The last one, some 92 years ago, still makes some, like yourself, "sick". That's understandable, but Pancho only invaded for the afternoon and was forced to retreat. Imagine how an Afghan, or a Syrian, is going to feel.

Ditto if you're referring to immigrants.


FYI, the Japanese invaded the United States WWII.
 
Posts: 1 | Registered: Mon 05 May 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
FriscoLady01
Experienced Member
Picture of FriscoLady01
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by brocknoland:
quote:
Originally posted by popsiq:
quote:
Originally posted by Black8:
RE: http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,166941,00.html

We should be doing the same thing on the border of the U.S. The American people are tired of being invaded by foreign forces.


What does the government having capability to curtail your ability to live or communicate in a modern society have to do with being "invaded by foreign forces"? (Which, my history books tell me, hasn't occurred since Pancho Villa raided New Mexico in 1916.)

More telling the effect of foreign invasions. The last one, some 92 years ago, still makes some, like yourself, "sick". That's understandable, but Pancho only invaded for the afternoon and was forced to retreat. Imagine how an Afghan, or a Syrian, is going to feel.

Ditto if you're referring to immigrants.


FYI, the Japanese invaded the United States WWII.


Well technically I guess the taking an occupation of Attu by Japanese troops could be classified as an invasion. Who did they conquer though a couple seals and a Seagull or two?

Sorry cannot be serious on this.

Pearl Harbor was an aerial attack, I guess you could call the Phillipines American territory at that time.
 
Posts: 3123 | Registered: Fri 22 December 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
rayevinsonsr
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
The Philippines was a possession to the United States prior to 1948, the Hawaian Isles also a possession, Aluetian Isles, German sabotuers infiltrated and since you brought the subject up, made grand jesters to Mexico for their oil. What oil Germany and Japan received never paid for and a relationship between the gringo and Hispanic was forged.
 
Posts: 5043 | Registered: Sat 20 October 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
5105868
New Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
The Philippines was a possession to the United States prior to 1948, the Hawaian Isles also a possession,



That's funny. The United States captured Hawaii with force just as illegally. No bullets fired but they put the queen of an independent soverignty in a jail cell and said we own Hawaii now. Look it up in the history book. And hope they never take it to an international court of law.
 
Posts: 44 | Registered: Wed 03 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
RHYNO506
Member
Posted Hide Post
I don't think its a good idea letting the "drones" cat outta the bag. The first Iranian asset to go if we strike will be thier air defense. Iam sure a hundred different scenarios have been played out, i just wonder if they have settled on 1. A corridor for the 3? carrier airwings, and the huge AF strike force. If it happens, the Iranian ability to strike back has to be stopped. Thier columns of tanks and mech infantry will be lit up real good, coz you have to believe they will be coming.
 
Posts: 1331 | Registered: Fri 01 December 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
BoltAction50cal
New Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RHYNO506:
I don't think its a good idea letting the "drones" cat outta the bag. The first Iranian asset to go if we strike will be thier air defense... Thier columns of tanks and mech infantry will be lit up real good, coz you have to believe they will be coming.


In one of the 1,000 or more scenarios that have been played out already the Joint Chiefs have not forgotten Syria, Lebannon, Egypt or the Gaza strip as strategic targets supplied, armed and ready to act on orders from Iran. It is a very very complicated situation that will play out very soon. Israel, and begrudingly the US, will not allow a fully nuked up and capable Iran. Watch for Israel's first strike backed by USAF Support.
 
Posts: 3 | Registered: Fri 09 May 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    US Electronic Fingerprints in Syria?

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.