Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Bad Apples and Bad Policy
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
*
Picture of Weatherguesser
Posted
Bad Apples and Bad Policy

http://www.military.com/opinion/0,15202,163985_2,00.html

And it is only going to get WORSE. Thank you Paul for standing and fighting the entrenched ignorance on capital hill with regards to Veterans Benefits.

I got this letter yesterday. PLEASE read, please help protect YOUR rights and benefits. It is NOT bogus!

------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
TO: All Disabled Veterans, All Those Concerned

Please read this update and I strongly urge you all to contact your legislators and let them know we oppose this act.

VA DISABILITY COMPENSATION UPDATE 02: The provisions of Senator Burr's America's Wounded Warrior Act (S 2674) and Rep. Steve Buyer's Nobel Warrior Act (HR 5509), would drastically change the disability compensation system for America's Veterans. These bills are loosely based on the recommendations of the President's commission on Care for America's Wounded Warriors (Dole/Shalala Commission), but the USDR believes the specifics of these bills would do great harm to these veterans in the following ways:

• Will offset VA Disability Compensation by Social Security when the veteran ages 65.

• Applicable to all currently discharging veterans AND any veteran under VA's current compensation system who files a subsequent claim for additional benefits.

• Once under the new system the veteran cannot return to the current system.

• The present protection for ratings in effect for 10 or more years would no longer apply..

• Would require the VA Secretary to examine or consider:

(a) The extent to which disability comp. may be used as an incentive to undergo treatment.

(b) The appropriate injuries to be covered under the new disability rating system.

(c) Age as a determining factor when considering average loss of earnings capacity

• Amends the law to provide the Secretary with authority to adopt and apply a rating schedule for specific injuries. This provision would expressly limit VA authority over the Rating Schedule and places the authority in the hands of Congress. If the Congress can not correct the Sustained Growth Rate formula of Medicare Law how can it be expected the Congress would do any better with the much more complex Disability Rating
Schedule?

• Provides for a quality of life payment, but only for those enrolled in the "new" compensation system.

• Allows or suggests: That VA "may take into account the effect on potential future earnings caused by the age of the veteran at the time a
disability rating is assigned." This provision would allow VA to compensate an older veteran at a lower percentage of disability than a younger
veteran for the exact same disease or injury. Is this not age discrimination?

• Provides that (a). As frequently as [the VA] considers it appropriate, [the VA] MUST reevaluate and "adjust the disability rating for any veteran receiving compensation".

(b) The VA must ... take into account any adjustments in the rating schedule that occurred since the last assignment of a rating;

(c) The frequency of reevaluations would be determined by an examining physician. This places physicians back in the rating business, allows for frequent adjustments to a veteran's rating based on perceived improvement, and further allows reductions based on a change in the rating criteria even when no improvement in the disability is shown.

For these reasons, USDR is encouraging veterans to contact their legislators and strongly urge them to oppose S2674/HR5509 and ANY OTHER legislation which is detrimental to and/or discriminatory against this nation's veterans. To facilitate doing this they have prepared a letter available the following Link, and it's EASY. Please send this to other Veterans, especially Disabled Veterans and those who love and care for them.

http://capwiz.com/usdr/issues/alert/?alertid=11114251&q...d=%5bcapwiz:queue_id

Yours in Comradeship,
Tim O’Connor
Adjutant, MN DAV
 
Posts: 2405 | Registered: Sat 23 September 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of TheTinker
Posted Hide Post
This is a very well written article...no bias to either side...no political statements...recognition for all who serve...and good support for the veterans...
 
Posts: 1036 | Registered: Mon 18 December 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of geehaw
Posted Hide Post
VIETNAM ALL OVER AGAIN. I can remember back in DEC 68 when my platoon at Paris Island, SC was drilling on the parade deck. My platoon 1046 was practicing the ceremonies for our JAN 69 graduation from boot camp. Our drill instructor ordered us to stand at ease while he pointed our the line of Greyhound buses wrapped around the entrance gate all the way to our barracks. The drill instructor said,"Ladies. Do ya'll see all those buses out there? I want ya'll to see this because what you see now is making Marine Corps History. All those buses are filled with drafted Marine recruits. This is the first time the Marine Corps has had to draft recruits since WWII".

Vietnam was not going very well at the time. The TET offensive in JAN 68 killed and wounded many Marines therefore the Marine Corps was having a hard time filling their monthly quota. The Marine Corps started drafting Marines.

Today there is no draft and the wars drone on and on with no foreign policy and no domestic policy. Today the USA is like a rudderless ship fixin to hit the gagged rocks of depression, recession, international instability.

SEMPER FI AND GOD BLESS AMERICA
 
Posts: 77 | Registered: Sat 23 December 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Suspended: 20 days.

Stillkit
Posted Hide Post
quote:
But telling the American people that war requires real sacrifice isn’t a popular talking point.

That could be because the war itself isn't popular with the American People. Had the administration put all the effort in Afghanistan and achieved positive results the story would have been different. But this is what we have and this is what we live with.
 
Posts: 13064 | Registered: Fri 22 September 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Bad Apples and Bad Policy

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.