Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    The Dogs of Holy War
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
RE: http://www.military.com/opinion/0,15202,160090,00.html

"Cry havoc, and let slip the dogs of war!" I just know this one's going to cause some comment, so I'll just sit back and see what everyone has to say before putting in my two cents.
 
Posts: 832 | Registered: Thu 05 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Ruanne
Posted Hide Post
I don't know. It was long and disparate enough, with a coupla too many strawmen set up, that I don't even want to poke at it. Even if likely agree with parts of it. I think it's the tone I take exception to. I don't much like diatribe, whether it's from the Left or Right.
 
Posts: 1706 | Registered: Thu 22 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
If a tree falls in a forest and lands on a politician, even if you can't hear the tree or the screams, I'll bet you'd at least hear the applause.
Paul Tindale
Picture of SLDO
Posted Hide Post
I dunno. Looks pretty good to me and a fairly good synopsis of history. A bit simplistic, but good. All, except the following"

"This led to World Wars I and II, and then the Cold War, which was an ideological struggle between the Judeo/Christian west and the Evil Empire of Godless Communists complete with proxy wars that featured more buggering of third world heathens."

The petty politics of Europe led to WWI and a slightly unbalanced wallpaper hanger the other. However, both were the end result of centuries of warfare and politics between neighbors that could not quite be finished once and for all.

Actually, the world’s stiffs and wars are nothing more than a continuum of petty feuding going back to the beginning of civilization. Nothing starts in a vacuum. Nothing just begins all of a sudden as some would like to think: Iran is one that comes to mind.

Now that I have started this, back to you, aunte.
 
Posts: 3524 | Registered: Fri 22 June 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of NSNN
Posted Hide Post
it is disheartening to watch the country Abraham Lincoln called mankind's "last best hope" devolve into a postmodern incarnation of the old world at its worst


"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
-Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
 
Posts: 3917 | Registered: Thu 12 February 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MarineAuntie:
RE: http://www.military.com/opinion/0,15202,160090,00.html

"Cry havoc, and let slip the dogs of war!" I just know this one's going to cause some comment, so I'll just sit back and see what everyone has to say before putting in my two cents.


See what you mean. Posting it is comparable to putting dog shiite in the middle of the road and watching people to see if they will step in it, or walk around!
 
Posts: 978 | Registered: Sat 24 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Suspended.
S_S
Posted Hide Post
quote:
If we're not very careful, our politicians will deliver unto us a brave new world of war everlasting with victory just around the corner forever and ever, amen. And if you really think more theo-conservative doctrine can solve our present cornucopia of foreign policy fiascos, please consider this: mankind has been praying for peace for as long as it has been fighting wars, which is about as long as there has been a mankind.

All that praying for peace hasn't done a fat lot of good, has it?
 
Posts: 4023 | Registered: Thu 08 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of NickBrand
Posted Hide Post
Over simplified "version," and I use that term extremely lightly, of world history.

Hes a hack same as hes accusing others of being.
 
Posts: 2041 | Registered: Thu 08 February 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
For proof that Bush invaded Iraq and Afghanistant because "God told him to", Huber quotes the BBC quoting Palestinians.

Thats...
I...
Uh...

There's really not much more to say after that, is there?

Swami
 
Posts: 320 | Registered: Wed 19 March 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by NickBrand:

Over simplified "version," and I use that term extremely lightly, of world history.

He's a hack same as he's accusing others of being.


Roger That Nick . . .
 
Posts: 1892 | Registered: Thu 05 December 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Jeff Huber and Joe Galloway are my two favorite op-ed writers, which most likely puts me in the minority on this forum. I think Mr. Huber states the facts with truth, clarity and good humor. He describes George Bush as a "messianic Evangelical Christian". I would agree with that description insofar as the Reverend Sun Myong Mun, founder of the Unification Church and self-professed reincarnation of Christ, can also be described as a "messianic Evangelical Christian".

BTW, why haven't we heard from Joe Galloway lately?
 
Posts: 704 | Registered: Tue 15 May 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of pltou812
Posted Hide Post
Nobody should vote for a candidate because of his religous views. Any candidate who says he talks to god or gets advice from god or will consider religion when making decisions that affect the American people should not be running for president. It is inconcievable that in this day and age people would allow their religion to affect any policy ofour government. Why don't we just go back to the stone age, live in mud huts and worship the sun. Mad
 
Posts: 284 | Registered: Tue 28 February 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
GONE
8 Nov
Fin
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by pltou812:
Nobody should vote for a candidate because of his religous views. Any candidate who says he talks to god or gets advice from god or will consider religion when making decisions that affect the American people should not be running for president. It is inconcievable that in this day and age people would allow their religion to affect any policy ofour government. Why don't we just go back to the stone age, live in mud huts and worship the sun. Mad


As the 60's democrats would sing, (while takin a toke), Let the sun shine..
 
Posts: 3394 | Registered: Thu 22 November 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of pltou812
Posted Hide Post
A fan of the fifth dimension I see........a little before my time, I grew up in the 90s. Here is one that was before my time as well

Imagine theres no heaven
Its easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
living for today
Imagine their no countries(except the U.S.A.)
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
AND NO RELIGION TOO
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace..........

And I couln't stand John Lennon(filthy hippy) when I was growing up, and now for some reason the music makes sense.
 
Posts: 284 | Registered: Tue 28 February 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of bwf27
Posted Hide Post
Misanthrope2: I agree with you about Huber & Galloway. They might put dents in the wood when they hit the nail so hard, but they're hitting the nail regardless.

As to Huber taking the sacred cow of religion in today's politics... (sorry, I couldn't help myself)... he reiterates the same irritation as many of our Founders with many of their contemporaries on this same problem. I honestly believe the Constitutional barrier between the Government and the Church was the 1770's PC version of what Jefferson called "the separation of Church and State." Be wary of anyone who controls a war machine and says he or she is getting "commands" or "instructions" or whatever from some greater-than-human source(s). The "source" might not be what you think. Wink
 
Posts: 1667 | Registered: Wed 02 August 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
pending ban Nemesis

Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bwf27:
Misanthrope2: I agree with you about Huber & Galloway. They might put dents in the wood when they hit the nail so hard, but they're hitting the nail regardless.

As to Huber taking the sacred cow of religion in today's politics... (sorry, I couldn't help myself)... he reiterates the same irritation as many of our Founders with many of their contemporaries on this same problem. I honestly believe the Constitutional barrier between the Government and the Church was the 1770's PC version of what Jefferson called "the separation of Church and State." Be wary of anyone who controls a war machine and says he or she is getting "commands" or "instructions" or whatever from some greater-than-human source(s). The "source" might not be what you think. Wink

And the source might be Dwight Eisenhower, a man who knew his onions if ever I saw one, and who explicitly warned about the situation pertaining in the US today. Talk about not learning from history!

Still, when you get folks like (mainly) Cheney at the helm and Bush to do his biddding, what can you expect?

MsG
 
Posts: 1173 | Registered: Sat 30 July 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly respected member

Picture of 6486143
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bugsy48:
quote:
Originally posted by bwf27:
Misanthrope2: I agree with you about Huber & Galloway. They might put dents in the wood when they hit the nail so hard, but they're hitting the nail regardless.

As to Huber taking the sacred cow of religion in today's politics... (sorry, I couldn't help myself)... he reiterates the same irritation as many of our Founders with many of their contemporaries on this same problem. I honestly believe the Constitutional barrier between the Government and the Church was the 1770's PC version of what Jefferson called "the separation of Church and State." Be wary of anyone who controls a war machine and says he or she is getting "commands" or "instructions" or whatever from some greater-than-human source(s). The "source" might not be what you think. Wink

And the source might be Dwight Eisenhower, a man who knew his onions if ever I saw one, and who explicitly warned about the situation pertaining in the US today. Talk about not learning from history!

Still, when you get folks like (mainly) Cheney at the helm and Bush to do his biddding, what can you expect?

MsG



Aw yes, not learning from history...is that the reason the UK is such a mess? They learned it from history? or they failed to learn?


Already past the future
 
Posts: 21404 | Registered: Mon 27 June 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Jeff Huber is right on.
The truth (hopefully) will set us free.

USAF (Ret)
 
Posts: 1 | Registered: Wed 23 January 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Huber is a senseless mindless hack who can pull a few historical facts together and make a shallow pointless observation of them. Wars are fought usually for secular reasons, with religion used as the Moral Justification. The Greek Wars did in fact match up city states with different patron gods/godesses. but were fought for regional domination, resources and control of trade routes. Same for the crusades. Funny how the pagans in most dire need of a swordpoint conversion mostly sat atop valuable commodities or strategic locations.
 
Posts: 648 | Registered: Thu 13 December 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
suspended 90 days as of 5/19/09
Posted Hide Post
Huber at his satiric best. Poking fun at another foundation on which a whack of people think America was built and the rest of the world should be. If it wasn't for the fact that thay have the ability to really move their agenda forward, it might be humorous.

This is a dated article but the 'good work' goes on.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20...005062202335_pf.html

Another reason that 'losing' is unthinkable.
 
Posts: 9726 | Registered: Wed 19 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
suspended 90 days as of 5/19/09
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SLDO:
I dunno. Looks pretty good to me and a fairly good synopsis of history. A bit simplistic, but good. All, except the following"

"This led to World Wars I and II, and then the Cold War, which was an ideological struggle between the Judeo/Christian west and the Evil Empire of Godless Communists complete with proxy wars that featured more buggering of third world heathens."

The petty politics of Europe led to WWI and a slightly unbalanced wallpaper hanger the other. However, both were the end result of centuries of warfare and politics between neighbors that could not quite be finished once and for all. Much of it religious in nature. 'God' was on everybody's side all along.

Actually, the world’s stiffs and wars are nothing more than a continuum of petty feuding going back to the beginning of civilization. Nothing starts in a vacuum. But religion has added new dimensions to the traditional casus belli. Nothing just begins all of a sudden as some would like to think: Iran is one that comes to mind. Strikes me the Iran became a "feuding" 'problem', not when it became a republic (which to US eyes in good) but an Islamic republic, which is the diametric opposite. But religion wasn't a problem under the Shah.

Now that I have started this, back to you, aunte.


Sorry for butting-in, couldn't resist. Wink
 
Posts: 9726 | Registered: Wed 19 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    The Dogs of Holy War

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.