Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Canadian Court to Rule on Gitmo
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
suspended 90 days as of 5/19/09
Posted
RE: http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,164685,00.html

Somebody let it out, at one of Khadr's Gitmo hearings, that he had been questioned by 'Canadian intelligence personnel'.

All this time we were told, as no doubt was he, that they were 'government representatives' making sure he was OK.

Since Canadian 'intelligence' has been somewhat 'sloppy' in their work of late, and somebody has declared Khadr's questioning a matter of National Security, the court is being asked to look into and rule on that claim.

This won't change 'Gitmo' - that's just pure malevolent 'justis'. But it might make the Canadian government change its stance on Khadr.
 
Posts: 9726 | Registered: Wed 19 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
He was a misguided youth when he killed that soldier. Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 8771 | Registered: Thu 21 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
suspended 90 days as of 5/19/09
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 67NOV:
He was a misguided youth when he killed that soldier. Roll Eyes


Don't know how 'misguided' he was, but, according to sitreps it's questionable, now, that 'he killed that soldier'.
 
Posts: 9726 | Registered: Wed 19 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of oseles
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 67NOV:
He was a misguided youth when he killed that soldier. Roll Eyes



Given that the Rolling Stone is not the most unbiased source for information, they still put out some pretty damming information.

quote:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/11128331/fol...hood_to_a_gitmo_cell
Posted Aug 10, 2006

His name was Omar Khadr. Born into a fundamentalist Muslim family in Toronto, he had been prepared for jihad since he was a small boy. His parents, who were Egyptian and Palestinian, had raised him to believe that religious martyrdom was the highest achievement he could aspire to. In the Khadr family, suicide bombers were spoken of with great respect. According to U.S intelligence, Omar's father used charities as front groups to raise and launder money for Al Qaeda. Omar's formal military training -- bombmaking, assault-rifle marksmanship, combat tactics -- before he turned twelve. For nearly a year before the Ab Khail siege, according to the U.S. government, Omar and his father and brothers had fought with the Taliban against American and Northern Alliance forces in Afghanistan. Before that, they had been living in Jalalabad, with Osama bin Laden. Omar spent much of his adolescence in Al Qaeda compounds.


Many of the liberal bloggers here say we must understand and honor the customs and beliefs of Islam rather than ‘impose’ our beliefs on them. According to Islamic Law and Custom in Egypt, Palestine, Pakistan and Afghanistan a male is considered an Adult at age 15.

Child - No. Religious Fanatic – Yes.
He had been in combat against Americans for a year before he was captured.

Poor innocent little Canadian child - NOT
 
Posts: 606 | Registered: Mon 21 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by oseles:
quote:
Originally posted by 67NOV:
He was a misguided youth when he killed that soldier. Roll Eyes



Given that the Rolling Stone is not the most unbiased source for information, they still put out some pretty damming information.

quote:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/11128331/fol...hood_to_a_gitmo_cell
Posted Aug 10, 2006

His name was Omar Khadr. Born into a fundamentalist Muslim family in Toronto, he had been prepared for jihad since he was a small boy. His parents, who were Egyptian and Palestinian, had raised him to believe that religious martyrdom was the highest achievement he could aspire to. In the Khadr family, suicide bombers were spoken of with great respect. According to U.S intelligence, Omar's father used charities as front groups to raise and launder money for Al Qaeda. Omar's formal military training -- bombmaking, assault-rifle marksmanship, combat tactics -- before he turned twelve. For nearly a year before the Ab Khail siege, according to the U.S. government, Omar and his father and brothers had fought with the Taliban against American and Northern Alliance forces in Afghanistan. Before that, they had been living in Jalalabad, with Osama bin Laden. Omar spent much of his adolescence in Al Qaeda compounds.


Many of the liberal bloggers here say we must understand and honor the customs and beliefs of Islam rather than ‘impose’ our beliefs on them. According to Islamic Law and Custom in Egypt, Palestine, Pakistan and Afghanistan a male is considered an Adult at age 15.

Child - No. Religious Fanatic – Yes.
He had been in combat against Americans for a year before he was captured.

Poor innocent little Canadian child - NOT


Well they sure don't honor any other religous beliefs. Lets send Dennis Kuccinich over. He can organize a big group hug with all the terrorist. Then they all can detonate at once in their frenzy to rid the world of the infidal making them participate in a group hug. That would be one heck of a Earth Shattering KABOOM!.
the suicide bomber problem solved
thorn in Ohio's side- solved
 
Posts: 708 | Registered: Sat 20 January 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
If you take your life at once aside

Then remove yourself from the cast

You will find the ship of fools steams on- regardless......

Leaving you free to sail on past.

-"Shaneo" 1998 West Australia
Posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 5896 | Registered: Mon 12 May 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member


Posted Hide Post
Screw the little POS, let him rot there just like the rest of the vermin.


"I reject your logic and replace it with my own"
 
Posts: 8954 | Registered: Mon 02 April 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:


So are we suppose to all feel sorry for the little terrorist after reading the story? SNIFF SNIFF WAH
Of course he is going to say all these horrible things, like having to clean the floor. I am so sorry we dont have a maid service to clean up after him.
 
Posts: 708 | Registered: Sat 20 January 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of ColonelM
Posted Hide Post
One quick way to solve the Gitmo problem. Exicute them all. Let Our GOD sort them out.
What does Canada Have to do with this anyway?
I think Nothing.
 
Posts: 22 | Registered: Mon 03 July 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of Motive25
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ColonelM:
One quick way to solve the Gitmo problem. Exicute them all. Let Our GOD sort them out.
What does Canada Have to do with this anyway?
I think Nothing.


Learning a lesson from Al Qaeda?
 
Posts: 4020 | Registered: Wed 01 February 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Banned by admin
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ColonelM:
One quick way to solve the Gitmo problem. Exicute them all. Let Our GOD sort them out.
What does Canada Have to do with this anyway?
I think Nothing.


yup use bullets dipped in pigs blood first... make damn sure they will not be maryters...
 
Posts: 39661 | Registered: Thu 18 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Banned by admin
Posted Hide Post
maybe we could create a new round??? made out of pig bone.... hehe
 
Posts: 39661 | Registered: Thu 18 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
suspended 90 days as of 5/19/09
Posted Hide Post
http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/357020

This is what Canada has to do with it.
 
Posts: 9726 | Registered: Wed 19 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
suspended 90 days as of 5/19/09
Posted Hide Post
If he did something wrong. Try him, prove it and convict him.

But if you have to turn yourselves into torturers and liars to do that, is it worth it?

You can't very well expect anybody to fight tyranny along side you, if all you're offering is a different brand of the same sh*t.

A democratic, freedom-loving, christian white man shooting bullets dipped in pig blood isn't much different that a jihadi shooting ball bearings dipped in his own. Except that the first one is likely to repeat the exercise, maybe hundreds of times.

If you can't fight, and win, with decency, I'd say you shouldn't be fighting at all.
 
Posts: 9726 | Registered: Wed 19 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member


Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by popsiq:
If he did something wrong. Try him, prove it and convict him.

But if you have to turn yourselves into torturers and liars to do that, is it worth it?

You can't very well expect anybody to fight tyranny along side you, if all you're offering is a different brand of the same sh*t.

A democratic, freedom-loving, christian white man shooting bullets dipped in pig blood isn't much different that a jihadi shooting ball bearings dipped in his own. Except that the first one is likely to repeat the exercise, maybe hundreds of times.

If you can't fight, and win, with decency, I'd say you shouldn't be fighting at all.


Tell that to the other side.


"I reject your logic and replace it with my own"
 
Posts: 8954 | Registered: Mon 02 April 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
suspended 90 days as of 5/19/09
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by joedokes:
quote:
Originally posted by popsiq:
If he did something wrong. Try him, prove it and convict him.

But if you have to turn yourselves into torturers and liars to do that, is it worth it?

You can't very well expect anybody to fight tyranny along side you, if all you're offering is a different brand of the same sh*t.

A democratic, freedom-loving, christian white man shooting bullets dipped in pig blood isn't much different that a jihadi shooting ball bearings dipped in his own. Except that the first one is likely to repeat the exercise, maybe hundreds of times.

If you can't fight, and win, with decency, I'd say you shouldn't be fighting at all.


Tell that to the other side.


Why? They already know that. You, apparently, don't.
 
Posts: 9726 | Registered: Wed 19 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
suspended 90 days as of 5/19/09
Posted Hide Post
The court ruled against Sadr to-day. That means he's not going to see the evidence against him that is being held by the Canadian government. The Court was swayed by the arguments of national security.

What the court did do, however, is declare the process and proceedings in place at Guantanamo to be illegal. In terms of Canadian law, and in terms of US law as stated in Supreme Court rulings in that regard.

This might tilt public opinion against the Canadian government which continues to render a citizen, charged with serious crimes, no assistance whatsoever.

One minor point to have arisen from this case is the loss of documents upon which the case against Khadr is predicated. What kind of competent authority 'loses' vital documents?

"Defence lawyers actually failed to get what they were looking for in Friday's ruling. Lawyers were hoping for access to a copy of a report detailing a 2002 Afghan gun battle during which Mr. Khadr is alleged to have thrown a grenade that killed a U.S. soldier – the allegation at the heart of the charges against him. The U.S. government gave a copy to the Canadians, but claims to have lost its own copy, meaning the Canadian copy is the only one whose location is known."

No matter, in the Gitmo courts the defendant will never know what hit him.
 
Posts: 9726 | Registered: Wed 19 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Super Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by popsiq:
The court ruled against Sadr to-day. That means he's not going to see the evidence against him that is being held by the Canadian government. The Court was swayed by the arguments of national security.

What the court did do, however, is declare the process and proceedings in place at Guantanamo to be illegal. In terms of Canadian law, and in terms of US law as stated in Supreme Court rulings in that regard.

This might tilt public opinion against the Canadian government which continues to render a citizen, charged with serious crimes, no assistance whatsoever.

One minor point to have arisen from this case is the loss of documents upon which the case against Khadr is predicated. What kind of competent authority 'loses' vital documents?

"Defence lawyers actually failed to get what they were looking for in Friday's ruling. Lawyers were hoping for access to a copy of a report detailing a 2002 Afghan gun battle during which Mr. Khadr is alleged to have thrown a grenade that killed a U.S. soldier – the allegation at the heart of the charges against him. The U.S. government gave a copy to the Canadians, but claims to have lost its own copy, meaning the Canadian copy is the only one whose location is known."

No matter, in the Gitmo courts the defendant will never know what hit him.


Canadian complicity? Say it ain't so...
Respectfully, SUNLINER81
 
Posts: 22576 | Registered: Thu 09 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
suspended pending review,Nemesis
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Motive25:
quote:
Originally posted by ColonelM:
One quick way to solve the Gitmo problem. Exicute them all. Let Our GOD sort them out.
What does Canada Have to do with this anyway?
I think Nothing.


Learning a lesson from Al Qaeda?


An increasingly common phenomanon. He doesn't know it, but that's a quote from Osama justifying 9/11. Of course WE'RE better than them, which is why in the past, this kind of thinking would mark the author as a nut. Now it's something we actually debate.

A sad time for all those who love America.

Dave
 
Posts: 12526 | Registered: Fri 17 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of fishnfanatic
Posted Hide Post
Hmmmmmmm

They lie to us and you say nothing about that.

They torture us, and you say nothing about that.

Since it appears you understand the Islamic faith, then you'd understand, "an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth".

Hmmmmmm????



quote:
Originally posted by popsiq:
If he did something wrong. Try him, prove it and convict him.

But if you have to turn yourselves into torturers and liars to do that, is it worth it?

You can't very well expect anybody to fight tyranny along side you, if all you're offering is a different brand of the same sh*t.

A democratic, freedom-loving, christian white man shooting bullets dipped in pig blood isn't much different that a jihadi shooting ball bearings dipped in his own. Except that the first one is likely to repeat the exercise, maybe hundreds of times.

If you can't fight, and win, with decency, I'd say you shouldn't be fighting at all.
 
Posts: 5017 | Registered: Wed 30 June 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Canadian Court to Rule on Gitmo

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.