Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    SEALs Stand Down for Safety Review
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
New Member
Posted
Although safety is definatly a big issue, these guys understand, probably better than anyone, what the risks are and are some of the most dedicated, enthusiastic soldiers in the world.
 
Posts: 22 | Registered: Mon 03 March 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of woodyarn
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by txnationalguard:
Although safety is definatly a big issue, these guys understand, probably better than anyone, what the risks are and are some of the most dedicated, enthusiastic soldiers in the world.


They are not soldiers they are Sailors
 
Posts: 204 | Registered: Wed 21 November 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 410 | Registered: Mon 09 May 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
I commend the Navy for taking this action, particularly related to training deaths. The fact is, most training accidents resulting in death are not only tragic, but also preventable. Corrective action taken as a result of investigation and root cause identification can and will decrease the number of Casualty Assistane Team visits that take place early in the morning, on uususpecting family members. Yes I know, military training is often very dangerous business. Better the military invest in lessons learned and corrective action, costly and continuing investigations and unnecessary funerals.... just my opinion.
 
Posts: 121 | Registered: Wed 27 August 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of NAVBLK4
Posted Hide Post
Marine Corps (includes Green Berets) a Dept. of the US Navy (includes Seals)
and were designated as the first strike force before any other military
components. Included are air, ground and sea forces, not just sailors.

quote:
Originally posted by woodyarn:
They are not soldiers they are Sailors

This message has been edited. Last edited by: NAVBLK4,
 
Posts: 645 | Registered: Sat 24 November 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of NAVBLK4
Posted Hide Post
1. Did they die from shoot failures?
2. Did they load their own shoots?
quote:
Originally posted by txnationalguard:
Although safety is definatly a big issue, these guys understand, probably better than anyone, what the risks are and are some of the most dedicated, enthusiastic soldiers in the world.
 
Posts: 645 | Registered: Sat 24 November 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Quiet Professional
BTDT
Picture of Shardik
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by NAVBLK4:
Marine Corps (includes Green Barets) a Dept. of the US Navy (includes Seals)
and were designated as the first strike force before any other military
components. Included are air, ground and sea forces, not just sailors.

quote:
Originally posted by woodyarn:
They are not soldiers they are Sailors


I think you misunderstood the post. It's what the component's members are called. Army = soldiers. USMC = marines. Navy = sailors. USAF = airmen.

BTW: Green barets are what girls wear in the part of their hair.
 
Posts: 893 | Registered: Sun 04 February 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
I wouldn't say anything about these specop guys. they know their thing. an accident is an accident and what happened is past. wish them luck in preventing any accident like that. Good luck to you all.
 
Posts: 35 | Registered: Mon 11 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of woodyarn
Posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by NAVBLK4:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Shardik:

No I was referring to real life, not literal bureacratic acronyms.

It was ment as a joke, but I understand that your type live life in such a serious, black & white manner.

This could be mis-intepreted by infidels.
What infidels are you talking about,certainly not the people on this site?
 
Posts: 204 | Registered: Wed 21 November 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of TxEzRider
Posted Hide Post
This has begun to be funny. But back on subject?
 
Posts: 161 | Registered: Tue 01 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Ten day suspension for violation of TOS 6ii.
05 Feb
Gypsysnipe
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by NAVBLK4:
quote:
Originally posted by Shardik:

No I was referring to real life, not literal bureacratic acronyms.
I think you misunderstood the post. It's what the component's members are called. Army = soldiers. USMC = marines. Navy = sailors. USAF = airmen.

This could be mis-intepreted by fundamentalist.
This could be mis-intepreted by infidels.
This could be mis-intepreted by legitimate spouses.
This could be mis-interpreted by a Green Baret causing battery due
to assault.

BTW: Green barets are what girls wear in the part of their hair.


In real life, the Green Berets are the US Army Special Forces, not the Marines.
 
Posts: 807 | Registered: Wed 04 May 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of NAVBLK4
Posted Hide Post
Since when, and are the Rangers not the US Army special forces?

This message has been edited. Last edited by: NAVBLK4,
 
Posts: 645 | Registered: Sat 24 November 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
-------------------

Proud Member
Derelict Veterans'
Group

-------------------

Picture of L0A1
Posted Hide Post
You are kiding right?

quote:
Originally posted by NAVBLK4:
Since when, and are the Rangers not the US Army special forces?
quote:
Originally posted by SATCOM_VET:
quote:
Originally posted by NAVBLK4:
quote:
Originally posted by Shardik:

No I was referring to real life, not literal bureacratic acronyms.
I think you misunderstood the post. It's what the component's members are called. Army = soldiers. USMC = marines. Navy = sailors. USAF = airmen.

This could be mis-intepreted by fundamentalist.
This could be mis-intepreted by infidels.
This could be mis-intepreted by legitimate spouses.
This could be mis-interpreted by a Green Baret causing battery due
to assault.

BTW: Green barets are what girls wear in the part of their hair.


In real life, the Green Berets are the US Army Special Forces, not the Marines.


Todays politics remind me of an old saying. - "Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas?" - Joseph Stalin
 
Posts: 8110 | Registered: Sat 03 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
There must have been some kind of gross negligence for them to do this.

When I was still in the 2nd Ranger Battalion I was SICK and TIRED of going to memorials of guys getting killed or seriously injured in Training accidents.

Parachute Fatalities
Friendly-Fire Fatalities in shoot houses

Training was not stopped though, I think 6 Rangers were killed in training during just my TWO YEARS I was there...

Something serious happen here with the SEAL's
 
Posts: 2046 | Registered: Tue 12 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of NAVBLK4
Posted Hide Post
This is interesting trivia and shows the US Army as green Berets.
< Link >


The above mentions Fort Bragg (US Army), however I was told Green Berets also trained
in the Sierra Nevada's outside of Bridgeport (Was the coldest town in the state of CA.)
and I don't believe this was a Army training area.

When I was 17 I was told by my US Marine recruiter there was a Marine Green Beret unit.
I also spoke to discharged Marines(assumed honorable) at the El Toro marine base air
show who identified themselves as former Green Berets. Late 70's early 80's.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: NAVBLK4,
 
Posts: 645 | Registered: Sat 24 November 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of woodyarn
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Aco275RGR:
There must have been some kind of gross negligence for them to do this.

When I was still in the 2nd Ranger Battalion I was SICK and TIRED of going to memorials of guys getting killed or seriously injured in Training accidents.

Parachute Fatalities
Friendly-Fire Fatalities in shoot houses

Training was not stopped though, I think 6 Rangers were killed in training during just my TWO YEARS I was there...

Something serious happen here with the SEAL's


Thats a very real possibility. I don't know how other services do it however in the Navy when you have a string of accidents it's not all that
unusaul for these safety stand downs. It's just a way to say, Ok something's wrong, lets step back take a deep breath look at the problem, shake the cobwebs out then carry on. Sometimes it's just a unit thing and sometimes it's navy wide. But I agree for the Seals to do it could be bad.
 
Posts: 204 | Registered: Wed 21 November 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of Duster6
Posted Hide Post
You want to know what I think? OK, I'll tell you.
Rule # 1. Don't be a cowboy.
Rule # 2. Be safe. Stay Alert.
Rule # 3. How you train is how you fight.
Rule # 4. If you go in, make sure you can come back.
Rule # 5. Never leave home with out your American Express card, Rolex watch, and gold Baht Chain.
Rule # 6. Have the proper tools for the proper job.

I have a few more rules but you all get the picture I hope.

All branches of Special Forces have their 10% bad apples and IMO they all have their 10% of those who complete the training course and once assigned to their units turn to Cowboys. They seem to think they have a better way all the time. Lucky for us that their is always the old timer on board that puts them in their place.
 
Posts: 12683 | Registered: Sun 24 October 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I'm sure they will take care of the problem whatever that might be, the two Military Freefall accidents were pretty unusual because they happen at the same place just days apart to very experienced operators.

BTW: There is no such thing as Marine Green Berets. They had Force Recon which is now Marine Special Operations Battalions....The British Royal Marines however do wear Green Berets Wink
 
Posts: 2046 | Registered: Tue 12 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member

Old Fart #00

Picture of JimSorber
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by NAVBLK4:
1. Did they die from shoot failures?
2. Did they load their own shoots?
quote:
Originally posted by txnationalguard:
Although safety is definatly a big issue, these guys understand, probably better than anyone, what the risks are and are some of the most dedicated, enthusiastic soldiers in the world.
Did you mean chutes instead of shoots? Also, chutes are not loaded, they are packed.
 
Posts: 7738 | Registered: Thu 23 January 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of DOD_YB8461
Posted Hide Post
This comes as no surprise to me. The best training in the world is only achieved by being as realistic and as close to paralleling the actual mission conditions as possible. SEALs are broken down and rebuilt with the never quit ethos. This is constantly solidified through each evolution and operation. They train as they fight, and they fight as they train. It's a grave loss for anyone in the armed forces when another brother or sister in arms falls. This is certainly never understated when a member of the sof community falls. It was good to stand down for a day.
 
Posts: 6 | Registered: Sun 25 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    SEALs Stand Down for Safety Review

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.