Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    DoD: Syria Supporting Foreign Fighters
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Picture of bwf27
Posted
RE: http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,163832,00.html

Top 10 Suggestions for what to do with Syria:
10) Offer to build a fence between Syria and Iraq.
9) Promise Syria that the U.S. has absolutely NO interest in medling in Syrian affairs... ever.
8) Promise Syria that the U.S. would never use it's Military in Iraq to aid Israel in any conflict between Israel and Syria.
7) Promise to also open U.S. Military bases in Syria so that Syria can also benefit from the economic boom and added security of having the U.S. Armed Forces embedded in their country.
6) Remind them how we have not armed the one million displaced Iraqis holding up in their country.
5) Convince Syria that they gain nothing by contributing to keeping us bogged down in Iraq.
4) Remind Syria that we are the "sole superpower" not they.
3) Offer to send them Tom DeLay to consult on ethics in government, Alberto Gonzales to help improve their justice system, and Scooter Libby to help them understand the problems with democracy, accountability and rule-of-law.
2) Promise Syria that we will do for Syria what we did for Iraq and Afghanistan.
1) Let them borrow our Constitution since nobody over here is paying all that much attention to it anyway. Wink
 
Posts: 1667 | Registered: Wed 02 August 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Our national symbol is the eagle. Ben Franklin wanted it to be the turkey, as he though it represented food and freedom. Somewhere along the line it became a piggy bank. I am still looking for the page in my Bible that says our mission on earth is to be the police force of the whole world. Any help out there?
 
Posts: 192 | Registered: Thu 12 October 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bwf27:
RE: http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,163832,00.html

Top 10 Suggestions for what to do with Syria:
10) Offer to build a fence between Syria and Iraq.
9) Promise Syria that the U.S. has absolutely NO interest in medling in Syrian affairs... ever.
8) Promise Syria that the U.S. would never use it's Military in Iraq to aid Israel in any conflict between Israel and Syria.
7) Promise to also open U.S. Military bases in Syria so that Syria can also benefit from the economic boom and added security of having the U.S. Armed Forces embedded in their country.
6) Remind them how we have not armed the one million displaced Iraqis holding up in their country.
5) Convince Syria that they gain nothing by contributing to keeping us bogged down in Iraq.
4) Remind Syria that we are the "sole superpower" not they.
3) Offer to send them Tom DeLay to consult on ethics in government, Alberto Gonzales to help improve their justice system, and Scooter Libby to help them understand the problems with democracy, accountability and rule-of-law.
2) Promise Syria that we will do for Syria what we did for Iraq and Afghanistan.
1) Let them borrow our Constitution since nobody over here is paying all that much attention to it anyway. Wink


We could just send them Jimmy Carter for elections, foreign policy, AND housing, Bill Clinton for ethics and morality, Nancy Pelosi to lead, and HRC for winning strategy. Then they can ignore the borrowed Constitution, too!
 
Posts: 978 | Registered: Sat 24 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
catahoulagill and bwf27; in due time, you MAY RECEIVE what you write about!

Look at it this way; USA President Obama hosts "Surrender Summit 20O9" at Camp David. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President Bashar al-Asad, President Raúl Castro, and Premier Kim Yong-il; will be invited and they could get "anything" you've included in your lists.

President Carter could be thrown in as a "Bonus!" And North Korean Premier Kim Yong-il would love to play "basketball" with former Secretary of State Madaline Albright, again.

After all, one of President Obama's first jobs (after surrendering in Iraq) is to "negotiate" with our enemies.

So, be "Forward Looking" Folks; the Future is Coming Up Next!

From A Proud Vietnam Veteran

quote:
Originally posted by catahoulagill:
quote:
Originally posted by bwf27:
RE: http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,163832,00.html

Top 10 Suggestions for what to do with Syria:
10) Offer to build a fence between Syria and Iraq.
9) Promise Syria that the U.S. has absolutely NO interest in medling in Syrian affairs... ever.
8) Promise Syria that the U.S. would never use it's Military in Iraq to aid Israel in any conflict between Israel and Syria.
7) Promise to also open U.S. Military bases in Syria so that Syria can also benefit from the economic boom and added security of having the U.S. Armed Forces embedded in their country.
6) Remind them how we have not armed the one million displaced Iraqis holding up in their country.
5) Convince Syria that they gain nothing by contributing to keeping us bogged down in Iraq.
4) Remind Syria that we are the "sole superpower" not they.
3) Offer to send them Tom DeLay to consult on ethics in government, Alberto Gonzales to help improve their justice system, and Scooter Libby to help them understand the problems with democracy, accountability and rule-of-law.
2) Promise Syria that we will do for Syria what we did for Iraq and Afghanistan.
1) Let them borrow our Constitution since nobody over here is paying all that much attention to it anyway. Wink


We could just send them Jimmy Carter for elections, foreign policy, AND housing, Bill Clinton for ethics and morality, Nancy Pelosi to lead, and HRC for winning strategy. Then they can ignore the borrowed Constitution, too!
 
Posts: 3381 | Registered: Sun 19 March 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
Nah...let's elect Sen. John McCain who will just nuke them all till they're non-glossy black and crispy.
 
Posts: 4169 | Registered: Thu 26 August 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I hope the evidence of Syria's support of foreign insurgents is a little better than what the article shows.
quote:
Despite counterterrorism efforts by Damascus, as much as 90 percent of the foreign fighters in Iraq cross the border from Syria ...

... the government of Iraq is also hamstrung by internal corruption and persistent problems getting basic services to the people, the report said.

... militants continue to find safe havens and logistical support in Syria.

" It is not clear that Syria has made a strategic decision to deal with foreign terrorists using Syria as a transit point into Iraq, " said the report, which covers events from December through February.

In late January, Iraqi officials suggested that about 150 foreign and Iraqi fighters slipped into the country from Syria a few months earlier and were responsible for a devastating explosion in northern Iraq that killed at least 38 people and wounded more than 200.

On the other border, meanwhile, Tehran's support for Shiite militant groups remains a sizable threat to stability in Iraq. The report asserts that the Quds Force, an elite unit of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, still provides much of the explosives for the militants.


Well, I can certainly see that Iran doesn't behave itself and find it credible that there's support of insurgents from the Quds force, but I've got to wonder why secular Sunni Syria would be so supportive of extremist Shiites. Why would they want even more instability when that instability has sent hundreds of thousands of refugees - many of them also Shiites - over the Syrian border? Moreover, is this article saying that 90% of the 150 foreign insurgents in the country came through Syria? How may does that make, 135? Out of an insurgency of thousands? And where did the 90% figure come from? Apparently it comes from the Iraqi government. How did they come up with that figure?

Too bad more of the actual language of the article wasn't posted because maybe it answers some of my other questions, such as why Iran would supply most explosives to insurgents when in many areas the insurgents are Sunnis. What does Iran have to gain from building the Sunni insurgency? And if they're actually only supplying the Shiites, isn't the Iraqi government predominantly Shiite? Why aren't THEY doing something about their religious brethren run amok?

There's just a lot about this report which isn't making a lot of sense to me and I would question the origin of some of the information in it. It appears to rely heavily on what the Iraqi government has said about the insurgents and their origins, but describes the government as corrupt and unreliable. Okay, then why are we listening to its assertions about the insurgency?
 
Posts: 832 | Registered: Thu 05 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of bwf27
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by catahoulagill:
We could just send them Jimmy Carter for elections, foreign policy, AND housing, Bill Clinton for ethics and morality, Nancy Pelosi to lead, and HRC for winning strategy. Then they can ignore the borrowed Constitution, too!
Touché Beer
 
Posts: 1667 | Registered: Wed 02 August 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of bwf27
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by WesLemmon:
catahoulagill and bwf27; in due time, you MAY RECEIVE what you write about!

Look at it this way; USA President Obama hosts "Surrender Summit 20O9" at Camp David....So, be "Forward Looking" Folks; the Future is Coming Up Next!
Oh Please! That whole negotiation=surrender thing might play for Vikings raiding the English Coast or for Julius Ceasar conquering Germania, but here in the Modern World it's the only sensible thing to do so long as one's homeland is relatively secure. Hypothetic or potential threats must be addressed through planning and readiness, not attack. Just IMHO. But I don't think I'm alone. In the final analysis, for no matter who wins in November, our foreign relations might be so FUBAR we'll have to gear up for WW-next (there's some debate between the neocons and every rational being as to whether it's WW-3 or WW-4).
 
Posts: 1667 | Registered: Wed 02 August 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
There is nothing new in this...It should be well noted that the rule of political leadership in Syria, as well as those in most Islamic countries, is held only with the blessings of the very secretive Muslim Brotherhood. No matter what sect or tribal affiliation, if any dare shirk in their obedience to this international organization of gangsters, then you can very well bet that their days will be numbered...the assassination of Anwar Sadat is a prime example that comes to mind. At any rate, our own country's leadership should be calling for Iraq to be spending these monetary surpluses, that they are accruing, for their own costs of existence & infrastructure; & that we will cease funding these costs immediately. In taking this critical step, we will then see just how serious & genuine the new Iraqi government is in taking hold of their own survival & destiny....
 
Posts: 988 | Registered: Tue 22 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ol_Doc:
Nah...let's elect Sen. John McCain who will just nuke them all till they're non-glossy black and crispy.


Damascus and Tehran nuclear test ranges?

Jim
LTC USAR Ret.
 
Posts: 79 | Registered: Thu 16 November 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
RE: "Overcoming corruption in the government, the judiciary and prison systems continue to be key challenges. And the Iraqi government is still struggling to provide basic services to its citizens."

Just like America, huh?

Jim
LTC USAR Ret.
 
Posts: 79 | Registered: Thu 16 November 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of godawgz
Posted Hide Post
If 90% of foreign fighters are coming thry Syria, sounds like a chokepoint to me.. and I read a report a while back that many foreign fighters particularly from North africa are rotating in and out of Iraq to gain experience to help them with their own jihads at home.... Maybe we could dart one of 'em and implant a tracking device like they use to study animal migrations.. track 'em to the nest and destroy it...
 
Posts: 5625 | Registered: Thu 24 January 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
How about having some of Irak's oil sent here to offset the costs of the war and at the same time lower the price of gas here.
 
Posts: 2 | Registered: Thu 13 March 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of WolfMurman
Posted Hide Post
Who's modern world are you talking about? Yours......... or Hugo Chavez? ..... or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?..... or Kim Jong-il?.......or Osama bin Laden?....... or Sheik Hassan Nasrallah?....... or Manuel Marulanda Velez......... or Mustafa Abu al-Yazid....... or....... ??? Should I go on with the list? I can......all day if you'd like. Me and the other Vikings are listening. Negotiations are fine if the people across the table wanna really move forward. BTW......we haven't had a World War for 60+ years because of who? Who's military strength? Who's Economic strength? Who's diplomatic abilities? Who's sacrifice's? The war-mongering, Imperialist United States? I don't think the people of Kuwait see it that way. What's that....?....did I hear you say Fidel Castro and his version of Cuban?
quote:
Originally posted by bwf27:
quote:
Originally posted by WesLemmon:
catahoulagill and bwf27; in due time, you MAY RECEIVE what you write about!

Look at it this way; USA President Obama hosts "Surrender Summit 20O9" at Camp David....So, be "Forward Looking" Folks; the Future is Coming Up Next!
Oh Please! That whole negotiation=surrender thing might play for Vikings raiding the English Coast or for Julius Ceasar conquering Germania, but here in the Modern World it's the only sensible thing to do so long as one's homeland is relatively secure. Hypothetic or potential threats must be addressed through planning and readiness, not attack. Just IMHO. But I don't think I'm alone. In the final analysis, for no matter who wins in November, our foreign relations might be so FUBAR we'll have to gear up for WW-next (there's some debate between the neocons and every rational being as to whether it's WW-3 or WW-4).
 
Posts: 195 | Registered: Tue 22 August 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bwf27:
RE: http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,163832,00.html

Top 10 Suggestions for what to do with Syria:
10) Offer to build a fence between Syria and Iraq.
9) Promise Syria that the U.S. has absolutely NO interest in medling in Syrian affairs... ever.
8) Promise Syria that the U.S. would never use it's Military in Iraq to aid Israel in any conflict between Israel and Syria.
7) Promise to also open U.S. Military bases in Syria so that Syria can also benefit from the economic boom and added security of having the U.S. Armed Forces embedded in their country.
6) Remind them how we have not armed the one million displaced Iraqis holding up in their country.
5) Convince Syria that they gain nothing by contributing to keeping us bogged down in Iraq.
4) Remind Syria that we are the "sole superpower" not they.
3) Offer to send them Tom DeLay to consult on ethics in government, Alberto Gonzales to help improve their justice system, and Scooter Libby to help them understand the problems with democracy, accountability and rule-of-law.
2) Promise Syria that we will do for Syria what we did for Iraq and Afghanistan.
1) Let them borrow our Constitution since nobody over here is paying all that much attention to it anyway. Wink
 
Posts: 6 | Registered: Sat 18 November 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by WolfMurman:
Who's modern world are you talking about? Yours......... or Hugo Chavez? ..... or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?..... or Kim Jong-il?.......or Osama bin Laden?....... or Sheik Hassan Nasrallah?....... or Manuel Marulanda Velez......... or Mustafa Abu al-Yazid....... or....... ??? Should I go on with the list? I can......all day if you'd like. Me and the other Vikings are listening. Negotiations are fine if the people across the table wanna really move forward. BTW......we haven't had a World War for 60+ years because of who? Who's military strength? Who's Economic strength? Who's diplomatic abilities? Who's sacrifice's? The war-mongering, Imperialist United States? I don't think the people of Kuwait see it that way. What's that....?....did I hear you say Fidel Castro and his version of Cuban?

Notice how the situation in Iraq stopped spiraling downward and started getting a little better once we started negotiating with the terrorists and with Iran? Could it be that negotiation is a useful strategy?
 
Posts: 999 | Registered: Tue 29 August 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of PanzerMeister
Posted Hide Post


Hint Hint.

My suggestions of "what to do with Syria".

1)Explain to them that if they will not stop dealing with terrorists, Israel (mainly) and USA (supportive only) will invade Syria ,find and kill Bashar and his goons.

2)Meanwhile put sanctions on Syria to get the point across.
 
Posts: 1894 | Registered: Fri 27 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    DoD: Syria Supporting Foreign Fighters

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.