Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Report Complete on Marine Shooting
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
New Member
Posted
RE: http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,163556,00.html

It's ridiculous that the report is classified - what's the purpose of having an inquiry? If the inquiry is finished, there should be some kind of decision as to whether or not there should be charges filed - otherwise the inquiry is NOT finished, or is merely a SHAM.
 
Posts: 1 | Registered: Sat 08 March 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of woodyarn
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 17104793:
RE: http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,163556,00.html

It's ridiculous that the report is classified - what's the purpose of having an inquiry? If the inquiry is finished, there should be some kind of decision as to whether or not there should be charges filed - otherwise the inquiry is NOT finished, or is merely a SHAM.


No not a sham, they want to make sure all the I's are dotted and T's are crossed. When dealing with something like this, you go slow and make sure everything is as it should be and no quick decisions are made. This is an inquiry kind of like a grand jury
 
Posts: 204 | Registered: Wed 21 November 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of phillystake
Posted Hide Post
There where times in IRAQ during our convoy missions that you had no choise but to shoot, inocent people got killed, but thats war there is nothing you can do.
It well always be our word aginst theres we are at war with them and thanks to our media it well always be lop-sided.
 
Posts: 473 | Registered: Wed 04 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
The FACTS must be made public for the good of the service.

The record of the Bush administration in lying and witholding information has destroyed the credibility of the military.

The only way to regain credibility is to be forthright. It is not fair to the accused nor the public to withold facts. Wink
 
Posts: 2519 | Registered: Sun 27 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
If you take your life at once aside

Then remove yourself from the cast

You will find the ship of fools steams on- regardless......

Leaving you free to sail on past.

-"Shaneo" 1998 West Australia
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 17104793:
RE: http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,163556,00.html

It's ridiculous that the report is classified - what's the purpose of having an inquiry? If the inquiry is finished, there should be some kind of decision as to whether or not there should be charges filed - otherwise the inquiry is NOT finished, or is merely a SHAM.



Complete=Finished ?



The general's attorneys will review the report and send it to Helland for final action, Gibson said. No timetable for a decision has been released.

Gibson said he didn't know whether any part of the report eventually would be made public.
 
Posts: 5901 | Registered: Mon 12 May 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of oseles
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by helez:
The FACTS must be made public for the good of the service.

The record of the Bush administration in lying and witholding information has destroyed the credibility of the military.

The only way to regain credibility is to be forthright. It is not fair to the accused nor the public to withold facts. Wink


quote:

Gibson said he didn't know whether any part of the report eventually would be made public. More than half the 47 witnesses testified at least partly in classified sessions during the 17-day hearing in January.

"Due to the inclusion of classified information, the overall report is classified," Gibson said.



What part of classified don't you understand?
Those facts that are unclassified or can be declassified may be released.

But if they recommend a Courts Martial, releasing any of the information prior to it would be Prejudicial.
The rules of testimony in a Court of Inquiry are those of gathering information, and in many cases do not rise to the level to be admissible in a Courts Martial.

Given your background, one would think you would know that.
 
Posts: 606 | Registered: Mon 21 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
We have our rules of engagement but these rules don't apply to our enemies I find it hard to believe that it was turkey shoot on a bunch of civilans on a ten mile stretch of road, I don't believe in just out right killing a person unless you know infact he is the enemy but there are so many cases of these people attacking our troops and then going back into their houses and watching (MOHAMADA, MOHAMADA) on their tv and acting as if they have no clue as to what's going on and then we find a stash of weopons in they're home's and they have another weopon that's not so deadly but effective, they'll just say it's murder so then our troops will go on trial. It's wrong!!!! Semper Fi
 
Posts: 10 | Registered: Thu 22 November 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of woodyarn
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 13359948:
We have our rules of engagement but these rules don't apply to our enemies I find it hard to believe that it was turkey shoot on a bunch of civilans on a ten mile stretch of road, I don't believe in just out right killing a person unless you know infact he is the enemy but there are so many cases of these people attacking our troops and then going back into their houses and watching (MOHAMADA, MOHAMADA) on their tv and acting as if they have no clue as to what's going on and then we find a stash of weopons in they're home's and they have another weopon that's not so deadly but effective, they'll just say it's murder so then our troops will go on trial. It's wrong!!!! Semper Fi


Seems to me that you are the only one here thats in a hurry to judge these men, everyone else is saying " slow down, let the system work as it is intended too"
 
Posts: 204 | Registered: Wed 21 November 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of Duster6
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 17104793:
RE: http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,163556,00.html

It's ridiculous that the report is classified - what's the purpose of having an inquiry? If the inquiry is finished, there should be some kind of decision as to whether or not there should be charges filed - otherwise the inquiry is NOT finished, or is merely a SHAM.


No its not. Anyone with any common sense that spent at least two weeks in the Military would know that when they classified this report all they were doing is admitting guilt and covering up that they f#cked up.
 
Posts: 12683 | Registered: Sun 24 October 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of phillystake
Posted Hide Post
In IRAQ one screw up was coverd by Ajazera TV sometimes they would stage an attack aginst our convoys showing only us shooting not the people who was shooting at us to make us look like the bad guys to the Islomic world.
I don't know if guys screwed up or not but at that time and place if they thought there lives was in danger then hell yes I would fierd too.
 
Posts: 473 | Registered: Wed 04 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of goldenwings
Posted Hide Post
171--

When did you serve in the Corps?



 
Posts: 20268 | Registered: Wed 23 July 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by phillystake:
There where times in IRAQ during our convoy missions that you had no choise but to shoot, inocent people got killed, but thats war there is nothing you can do.
It well always be our word aginst theres we are at war with them and thanks to our media it well always be lop-sided.


Finally someone else on here with some common sense. Where the heck have you been hiding? Lately it seems that most posts on here are are anti-war or anti-military. It is a pleasure to read a post that tells it like it is. Thank you for your service.
 
Posts: 1292 | Registered: Wed 01 February 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Duster6:
quote:
Originally posted by 17104793:
RE: http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,163556,00.html

It's ridiculous that the report is classified - what's the purpose of having an inquiry? If the inquiry is finished, there should be some kind of decision as to whether or not there should be charges filed - otherwise the inquiry is NOT finished, or is merely a SHAM.


No its not. Anyone with any common sense that spent at least two weeks in the Military would know that when they classified this report all they were doing is admitting guilt and covering up that they f#cked up.


They may have been so some years back but not now. There are many reasons for this being classified at this point. Eventually it will more than likely become de-classified and will be listed with FOIA. Under those circumstances, if there were any discrepancies in any of the reports it would be found out and open for reinvestigation.
 
Posts: 1292 | Registered: Wed 01 February 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of EAG154
Posted Hide Post
Some seem to be sitting with their feet waveing back and forth waiting with great anticipation for any flimsy excuse to bash the militay Razz
 
Posts: 7598 | Registered: Tue 01 August 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of phillystake
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rkgtactical:
quote:
Originally posted by phillystake:
There where times in IRAQ during our convoy missions that you had no choise but to shoot, inocent people got killed, but thats war there is nothing you can do.
It well always be our word aginst theres we are at war with them and thanks to our media it well always be lop-sided.



Finally someone else on here with some common sense. Where the heck have you been hiding? Lately it seems that most posts on here are are anti-war or anti-military. It is a pleasure to read a post that tells it like it is. Thank you for your service.

Sorry to be hideing I stayed off here for awhile due to the Dumb A$$es that dident know what the hell they where talking about or the ones that where on here just to pick a fight with a service member. You know the ones they say that one thing that only a Obama or a Clinton would say.
 
Posts: 473 | Registered: Wed 04 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
I've got a pretty good handle on "Classified". I spent more than a few weeks in the service! I also understand reporting certain facts in such a way that the Marines look guilty while still saying that the "case is classsified, so we don't have to PROVE anything in print". Somewhere between 5 and 19 "civilians" killed, that's a pretty big spread! I think "civilians" could very easily be called "insurgents" depending on who is telling the story. The case wasn't so "classified" that the media had enough information to bad talk the Marines!
A drug dealing gang-banger in east LA can be called a "child" when it suits the press and polititians!
 
Posts: 120 | Registered: Fri 15 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
I'm just exspressing my opinion on this matter I'm not passing judgement I was just saying that I believe there is more to the story than our troops going out and killing a bunch of civilians, I believe our troops were attacked and they fired back, if you nitice it seems like more and more members of our armed forces are being brought up on charges of somekind. I believe our enemies are using ourjustice system to they're advantage even if we are right they'll try to make it look wrong Semper Fi Jarhead7377
quote:
Originally posted by woodyarn:
quote:
Originally posted by 13359948:
We have our rules of engagement but these rules don't apply to our enemies I find it hard to believe that it was turkey shoot on a bunch of civilans on a ten mile stretch of road, I don't believe in just out right killing a person unless you know infact he is the enemy but there are so many cases of these people attacking our troops and then going back into their houses and watching (MOHAMADA, MOHAMADA) on their tv and acting as if they have no clue as to what's going on and then we find a stash of weopons in they're home's and they have another weopon that's not so deadly but effective, they'll just say it's murder so then our troops will go on trial. It's wrong!!!! Semper Fi


Seems to me that you are the only one here thats in a hurry to judge these men, everyone else is saying " slow down, let the system work as it is intended too"
 
Posts: 10 | Registered: Thu 22 November 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 13359948:
We have our rules of engagement but these rules don't apply to our enemies I find it hard to believe that it was turkey shoot on a bunch of civilans on a ten mile stretch of road, I don't believe in just out right killing a person unless you know infact he is the enemy but there are so many cases of these people attacking our troops and then going back into their houses and watching (MOHAMADA, MOHAMADA) on their tv and acting as if they have no clue as to what's going on and then we find a stash of weopons in they're home's and they have another weopon that's not so deadly but effective, they'll just say it's murder so then our troops will go on trial. It's wrong!!!! Semper Fi

It is absolutely and completerly shameful that those who would protect us must be exposed to a cruel punishment if they are acting to protect themselves, thiir mates and the citizens of the USA.
 
Posts: 7 | Registered: Wed 08 June 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of Duster6
Posted Hide Post
Some of you newbies need to wise up and understand how the military works. Every branch of every service to include SF, SEALS, Rangers, Marines, AF CCT, etc, etc, have screwed up. Remember the convoy that took the wrong turn at the beginning of the war? Remember some of the bigger screw ups in WWII? Any screw ups in Vietnam? It just so happens that sometimes for the good of the services things are marked classified when they really aren't. What is so dang gum hard to understand about that?
 
Posts: 12683 | Registered: Sun 24 October 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Bowlers have BIG balls!"


Picture of Kegler300
Posted Hide Post
I was the security advisor to the court and my team processed over 5,000 documents that were classified secret for the COI. The majority of the testimony revolved around secret CONOPS, so the court members' findings, conclusions, and recommendations are still classified until declassified by the OCA. I sat through almost all of the testimony, and there is more to the story as suggested in a previous post.


"The World's Finest"
 
Posts: 15567 | Registered: Wed 07 March 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Report Complete on Marine Shooting

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.