Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Officers to be Fired Over B-52 Nuke Incident
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
 
Posts: 410 | Registered: Mon 09 May 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
RE: http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,153136,00.html

You'd think someone on the tarmac would've asked, "what are those things doing under the wing?" or "Is someone going to sign for these?" Eek
 
Posts: 150 | Registered: Mon 12 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Golgoth
Posted Hide Post
Snafu city!
 
Posts: 1393 | Registered: Tue 21 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of JNickel185748
Posted Hide Post
OMG. In Supply, I had to account more closely for the winter field jackets than this. I wonder what they mean by fired in this context. Relieved of duty in this job? And shuffled off to another job? Put out of the service? Not as obscure as the meaning of "is" but open to interpretation.

.05
 
Posts: 509 | Registered: Wed 20 December 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
I assume they mean pilots when they say officers. The bombs were under one wing. I would think the plane would fly differently and the pilot would notice.
 
Posts: 131 | Registered: Sat 22 April 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
I love the sentence int eh article that says this is the worst "known" incident in decades. It made me laugh. The only thing I bet these people did differently than SOP was they got caught. Doesn't make it right what happened... just saying I doubt they just ignored the rules and regulations for handling the weapons overnight, and this is probably a bigger issue than the military ever will give it credit for...
 
Posts: 5 | Registered: Sat 20 January 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
"B-52 Nuke Incident to Result in Firings"

Duh!
 
Posts: 8783 | Registered: Thu 21 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Copper71
Posted Hide Post
WTF. I hope these guys have had drug tests. I can see one F.U. but not that number. I'd like to hear the rest of the story.
 
Posts: 527 | Registered: Sun 01 October 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
10 day warning for posting hot links. (25 Nov 08) vighper
Posted Hide Post
quote:
The only thing I bet these people did differently than SOP was they got caught.

I don't know what to think. I worked with a corporation that was involved in the management of the nuclear stockpile of one of our nato allies (thats Ill Im going to say but you could probably figure it out who and what country quite easily from google)

The beaurocracy surrounding that program was reached a level of anal-rententiveness that is nigh unimaginable, and really, I was just on the outside looking in, not dealing with anything nearly as sensitive as the actual 'physics package'...

To move these weapons around so haphazardly the personel would have had to willingly and conciously ignored not one but several (at LEAST 3) checks that are supposed to create immediate paper trails of such movement. There is no way this could have been just "an oversight". Not one, but a group of people had willfully blown off responsiblities that they knew they had... I can certainly sympathize, but their will be consequences..
 
Posts: 537 | Registered: Thu 05 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Is this why the AF doesn't issue bullets?

SNAFU! Pure and Simple.

The only one really responsible is the guy at the top.

Mission accomplished, Sir; all nukes, well, er... most of'em accounted for.
 
Posts: 3 | Registered: Thu 27 February 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Bottomline. Too many assumptions. "Assume" makes an arse out of you and me...

Pilots didn't do their pre-flight check/inspection, NCOIC of aircraft didn't do his job (checking behind & before the pilots), and on, and on...

Failure to Follow Regulatory Guidelines Clearly Outlined to Prevent This Very Incident.

Hammerheads
 
Posts: 1892 | Registered: Thu 05 December 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of sgttwk
Posted Hide Post
The bottom line their is no excuse for this it is just pure incompetence.
 
Posts: 52 | Registered: Sat 22 April 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
First off, the BUFF most likely had the nuke's loaded interneally in the bomb bay, not the wings...
This incident was purely camplaicency... Lot's of people should be held accountable for this to include the maintenance officers, the Sq commander, the weapons load crew, the pilots, the SF's who were supposed to be guarding the secure area holding the nuke's, and the ordinance crew and all of their shift supervision. Regardless of how bad it was, I'll bet it does not happen again...
 
Posts: 1 | Registered: Thu 18 October 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of JNickel185748
Posted Hide Post
Anybody remember the incident when the squadron(s) from Holliman AFB came back from an exercise in Germany and got caught smuggling wine? They fired everybody who made more than fifty cents an hour.

.05
 
Posts: 509 | Registered: Wed 20 December 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RT841:
I assume they mean pilots when they say officers. The bombs were under one wing. I would think the plane would fly differently and the pilot would notice.


Nope, you're wrong. The pilots are actually in the clear because they signed for the missiles and not the warheads. From the outside, you can't tell. No, the officers they are talking about are the officers in the aircraft maintenance squadron, the co of the munitions squadron, the wing commander, the support group commander, the aircraft squadron commander, etc.
 
Posts: 3000 | Registered: Wed 16 July 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of gmost
Posted Hide Post
quote:
All spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on the record.


JHC! Whenever I read these "disclaimers" I am reminded of old women gossiping over the backyard fence.

Journalism at the least common denominator level.
 
Posts: 1151 | Registered: Tue 20 September 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
EIB, Follow Me!
Picture of bowmasterX
Posted Hide Post
Awww, c'mon...it's not like they actually dropped them or something.

Seriously, I don't understand how this happens. I was in a Nuclear unit in Germany and access to the bunker that housed the warheads was very closely monitored & access was highly restricted.

I don't know how the missiles on this aircraft look, but on Pershing Nuclear Missiles the end of the missile is literally flat unless it is armed with the warhead. There are dummy warheads, but they were rarely used. Raising the missile with a live warhead was actually considered an act of war.

At our missile site in Germany there were 3 missile pads each with 3 missiles. Only one of the pads was called the "hot pad" meaning all 3 missiles were armed and ready for flight. Those missiles were never raised & we were constantly updated on which pad was the hot pad in case it changed. We could not even devulge to our batallion S-2 which one was hot when they came to inspect. I would think the Air Force would know how many ready to fly missiles they had and the precise location of each one. How the hell do you just load up a couple nukes and take them on a joy ride and no one notices?


Stop taking life so seriously, you're not getting out alive anyway.
 
Posts: 1776 | Registered: Sat 09 December 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of bucanero
Posted Hide Post
I was an NCO from BAFB and I want to say that those firings should continue to Barksdale's leadership too. I saw personel whom do absolutely nothing to assess any situation and allow incidents to agravate even much worse. The TMO flight of the 2nd LRS squadron is plagued with a gang. As you know, only five of those six nukes were recovered but there's one still missing wich proves the level of incompetence that those B-52 units due to their complaciency. Now if those missiles were to be scrapped as dummy bombs, then the sixth nuke might be in the DRMO section between 2 LRS and the DRMO center in Texarkana. And for lastI'm proud to be in the USAF but I'm extremely ashamed to be assigned in Barksdale AFB.
 
Posts: 1 | Registered: Wed 11 April 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Picture of 10tenths
Posted Hide Post
There are more than just the officers that lost their job, I am sure. I wouldn't be surprised to hear that a few NCOs and lower enlisted went in front of the old man. While the enlisted will get a good amount of crap (the whole NJP schlaparooskie), those officer's careers are definitely over.
 
Posts: 5120 | Registered: Wed 23 May 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Air Force Retired
Picture of ss_287
Posted Hide Post
There should be in place a number of check and balances. Those weapons are not normally in an armed configuration and there should have been at least 2 or more coded verifications to authorize the arming and loading of those weapons. The flight crew also should have to verify weapon status condition before flight. I believe that there were more individuals that should be held accountable not just the 5 officers that have been found accountable as reported by the media. We cannot allow
complacency of procedures of this or any potential catastrophic incident to go unchecked at any time. We must have in place and follow those strict procedures when positioning and arming aircraft weapon systems.

http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/nuclear-bomb-test.jpg
 
Posts: 2197 | Registered: Wed 06 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Officers to be Fired Over B-52 Nuke Incident

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.