Check These Out: Buddy Finder | Videos | SpouseBUZZ | My Friend Network | News | Military Equipment


Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Guard Members Applaud Withdrawal Call
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
 
Posts: 410 | Registered: Mon 09 May 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Another example of why Guard troops have the stigma of being undisciplined, unprofessional and less capable than Active troops. Politicians can say what they want, but for soldiers to act in such a manner shows lack of professionalism. You can keep you second rate, unruly troops puerta rico
 
Posts: 13 | Registered: Mon 27 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Picture of Silent_0311
Posted Hide Post
Agreed, take them out of Iraq send me there. Marines are always ready, willing, and able.

Semper fi
 
Posts: 207 | Registered: Sun 22 July 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
I am with you Monkey. This is exactly why the Guard has the rep that they do.
 
Posts: 3 | Registered: Tue 07 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
And this comes from a providence that 45% wants to remain just that, a US Territory; 45% wants to be a state; and 10% wants to be their own, separate country. And they say we can't make up our minds what to do in Iraq...
 
Posts: 24 | Registered: Fri 15 December 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
I am in the National Guard (Alaska) This just makes the Guard look worse. I just left Active Army with the 172nd Stryker Brigade. Active troops either Marine, Soldiers, Airmen or Sailors would have the fortitude to not pull something like this. Oh, by the way puerto rico, maybe we should have NOT fought the Spanish (losing us troops in the process )and let them keep control of your land.
 
Posts: 13 | Registered: Mon 27 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mozesa:
I am with you Monkey. This is exactly why the Guard has the rep that they do.

If the Guard is so bad...quit deploying them. Simple problem, simply solved.
 
Posts: 4169 | Registered: Thu 26 August 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
*

Picture of mmulder67
Posted Hide Post
I find it strange how everyone seems to degrade the national guard when the guard is expected to do the same job as the active duty without the same equipment, the same training (as guard members are civilians and don't train as a collective on a daily basis), funding or benefits. If you want the national guard to do the job of active duty then institute a draft and do the same thing that was done 40 years ago for that other "war", and that is send people over there for 1 year at a time. Make it non-deferrable and no exceptions (that means if your daddy is a politician you still go). And if you want to join the guard they will be more than happy to take you after your 1 year tour on active duty overseas.


Of all escape mechanisms, Death is the most efficient. ~~ H.L. Mencken
 
Posts: 3331 | Registered: Thu 16 February 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mmulder67:
I find it strange how everyone seems to degrade the national guard when the guard is expected to do the same job as the active duty without the same equipment, the same training (as guard members are civilians and don't train as a collective on a daily basis), funding or benefits. If you want the national guard to do the job of active duty then institute a draft and do the same thing that was done 40 years ago for that other "war", and that is send people over there for 1 year at a time. Make it non-deferrable and no exceptions (that means if your daddy is a politician you still go). And if you want to join the guard they will be more than happy to take you after your 1 year tour on active duty overseas.

Beer
 
Posts: 4169 | Registered: Thu 26 August 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Yeah, good idea. Stop deploying them. How about training them to standard and kicking out the ones who don't produce. I didn't say they are useless just are not up to the same level as Active. There are some VERY GOOD Guard units such as 19th Group (S.F.) Aviation and various combat arms units JUST NOT THE puerto rican guard
 
Posts: 13 | Registered: Mon 27 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MonkeyofMayhem:
Yeah, good idea. Stop deploying them. How about training them to standard and kicking out the ones who don't produce. I didn't say they are useless just are not up to the same level as Active. There are some VERY GOOD Guard units such as 19th Group (S.F.) Aviation and various combat arms units JUST NOT THE puerto rican guard

They are trained to standard. But when your training time is limited to 1 weekend per month and 2 wks per year...it's a little tought to compare readiness with the Active Component. Then consider that mobilization train-up time has been reduced...well, you see where this is going. You're right though, we do have some excellent combat units in the NG. The Puerto Rican Guard doesn't exactly have a stellar reputation within the NG, so the article doesn't really suprise me. Judging the NG by this unit is not especially useful (IMHO).
 
Posts: 4169 | Registered: Thu 26 August 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
We are not "degrading" the Guard. Just calling it as we see it, sorry man the truth hurts. Many guard units do the same job as Active just not as well. That is why there are jokes about the Guard being slackers because it is somewhat true. Hell, my own unit has many turds, but should I be like you and deny it or face the truth, fix the problem and move on by kicking out the losers, training them to standard and leading the ones who are capable.
 
Posts: 13 | Registered: Mon 27 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of smokey5
Posted Hide Post
And the Governor is a Democrat. Ok, that about says it all.
 
Posts: 859 | Registered: Wed 20 October 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Experienced Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MonkeyofMayhem:
We are not "degrading" the Guard. Just calling it as we see it, sorry man the truth hurts. Many guard units do the same job as Active just not as well. That is why there are jokes about the Guard being slackers because it is somewhat true. Hell, my own unit has many turds, but should I be like you and deny it or face the truth, fix the problem and move on by kicking out the losers, training them to standard and leading the ones who are capable.

No the truth doesn't hurt. You need to remember that the Guard (for all intents and purposes) was tasked as it's federal mission to act as a "speed bump" while active component forces could be brought up to strength. At least that was the mission of my unit. No one expects the NG (as a whole) to perform at the level of the Active Component (if they did...they would be the Active Component).
 
Posts: 4169 | Registered: Thu 26 August 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I do not think the good soldiers of the Puerto Rican National Guard should be put down for what the Governor of PR says. Many politicians in this country oppose the war and also oppose sending their NG overseas,so I do not under stand why people got to get upset with just the Puerto Rican NG. Most of these soldier of the PR NG is ready for the federal call up just as the Guam National Guard and all the other state and territorial NG.

One difference that of the state NG and the territorial NG is that the soldiers in the states NG can vote for the person that sends them to war;but the soldiers in the territorial NG can not! But they put their life on the line none the less!

Isla Guam Tano y Chamorro
Biba Guahan yan Puerto Rico National Guard

This message has been edited. Last edited by: islaguam96915,
 
Posts: 675 | Registered: Thu 21 November 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Listen man, it is clear you don't know how mobilization works. If you think "training for deployment" means 1 weekend a month (a MUTA 4-drill) and 2 weeks per year (Annual training) is how the NG preps for War, than you are really uninformed. Let me explain it to you. HERE GOES: A MOBing unit will go title 10 (active) for about 6 months and train FULL TIME for it's wartime operations, this can take place at home staion or more than likely at a MOB station such as Camp Shelby, Miss or Camp Blanding, FL (none of this is classified info)This is IN ADDITION to drills and AT throughout the year. I know this because I am the MOB NCO for the AK Guard. I am also prior active Army Infantry with deployments to Iraq (2X) Kosovo, and Panama, So, I see both sides of the fence.
 
Posts: 13 | Registered: Mon 27 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
You know Man, Marines would never do what the P.R. Guard troops did. At least Marines have honor even if they did want to deploy.
 
Posts: 13 | Registered: Mon 27 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
oops, I meant "even if they Didn't want to deploy.
 
Posts: 13 | Registered: Mon 27 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
The so called "good" puerto rican soldiers are not being put down for what their gov said, the are being put down for being unprofessional and undisiciplined by their actions. Do you support them giving abigal a standing ovation for criticising the war effort? Talk about NO CLASS. puerto rico should never be a U.S State.
 
Posts: 13 | Registered: Mon 27 August 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Highly Experienced Member
Picture of oldmole
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by islaguam96915:
I do not think the good soldiers of the Puerto Rican National Guard should be put down for what the Governor of PR says. Many politicians in this country oppose the war and also oppose sending their NG overseas,so I do not under stand why people got to get upset with just the Puerto Rican NG. Most of these soldier of the PR NG is ready for the federal call up just as the Guam National Guard and all the other state and territorial NG.

One difference that of the state NG and the territorial NG is that the soldiers in the states NG can vote for the person that sends them to war;but the soldiers in the territorial NG can not! But they put their life on the line none the less!

Isla Guam Tano y Chamorro
Biba Guahan yan Puerto Rico National Guard


Can't say anything one way or the other about either National Guard units, but if Staff Sergeant Mendiola, one of my drill instructors, was a representative sample of Guamanians they are just fine with me. I have always been curious about whether it was common usage there to attach the words "and $hit" to the end of every sentence, but he certainly had a great sense of humor ... it was everything he could do to keep from cracking up just looking at our sorry selves in first phase.

My best respects to you and those of your island.
I erensia, lina'la', espiriitu-ta Cool
 
Posts: 10931 | Registered: Mon 05 June 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2 3  
 

Military.com    Military.com Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Hot Topics & Current Events  Hop To Forums  In the News    Guard Members Applaud Withdrawal Call

© 2009 Military Advantage, Inc.